Beasley v. United States, 349 U.S. 907 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
Beasley v. United States, 349 U.S. 907 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“we, like congress, leave the regulation of marine insurance where it has been, with the states”
65 citation events across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Signal Capital Corp. v. Eastern Marine Management, Inc. (nysd, 1995-09-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1955 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1955 1990 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Signal Capital Corp. v. Eastern Marine Management, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1995 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
we, like congress, leave the regulation of marine insurance where it has been, with the states
discussed Cited "see" Reed v. United States
D.C. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Tune, 17 N.J. 100 , 110 A.2d 99, 105 (1954) (without record of or bona fide reason to believe existence of prior conviction, cross-examiner bound by denial of witness), cert. denied, 349 U.S. 907 , 75 S.Ct. 584 , 99 L.Ed. 1243 (1955).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Stasio (2×)
N.J. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Tune, 17 N.J. 100, 114-115 (1954), cert. den. 349 U.S. 907 , 75 S.Ct. 584 , 99 L.Ed. 1243 (1955).
discussed Cited "see" Tommy Herschel Clingan and William Monroe Clingan v. United States
5th Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Beasley v. United States, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 406 , 218 F.2d 366 , certiorari denied 349 U.S. 907 , 75 S.Ct. 584 , 99 L.Ed. 1243 , which involved a prosecution for the illegal sale, purchase and concealment of a narcotic.
cited Cited "see" State v. SINCLAIR
N.J. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. White, 27 N. J. 158, 165-166 (1958) and State v. Tune, 17 N. J. 100, 115-116 (1954), certiorari denied 349 U. S. 907 , 75 S. Ct. 584 , 99 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Joseph Francis Newman v. United States
8th Cir. · 1964 · signal: see also · confidence low
If the judgment of conviction is later reversed, the defendant has suffered, unjustly and irreparably, the prejudice, if any, caused by the disclosure of the former conviction.” Campbell v. United States, 85 U.S.App.D.C. 133 , 176 F.2d 45, 47 (1949); see also Beasley v. United States, 94 U.S. App.D.C. 406, 218 F.2d 366 (1954), cert. denied 349 U.S. 907 , 75 S.Ct. 584 , 99 L.Ed. 1243 (1955); Fenwick v. United States, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 212 , 252 F.2d 124 (1958).
Beasley
v.
United States
No. 402.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 11, 1955.
349 U.S. 907
Richard W. Tompkins for petitioner., Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrov-sky for the United States.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.