North Carolina v. United States, 350 U.S. 805 (1955). · Go Syfert
Search
North Carolina v. United States, 350 U.S. 805 (1955). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Illinois (scotus, 1958-01-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956 1991 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Illinois
SCOTUS · 1958 · signal: see · confidence high
See North Carolina v. United States, 128 F. Supp. 718 , affirmed, 350 U. S. 805 ; Illinois v. United States, 101 F. Supp. 36, 47 , affirmed, 342 U. S. 930 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
North Carolina
v.
United States
No. 55.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1955.
350 U.S. 805
Harry McMullan, Attorney General, and I. Beverly Lake, Assistant Attorney General, for the State of North Carolina, and R. Brookes Peters for the North Carolina State Highway and Public Works Commission, appellants. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman and Edward M. Reidy for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, and James B. McDonough, Jr., Charles P. Reynolds, Arthur J. Winder, William T. Joyner, Arthur J. Dixon and Henry J. Karison for the Aberdeen & Rock-fish Railroad Co. et al., appellees.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina.

Per Curiam:

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.