green
Positive treatment
1.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1956 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1956
1991
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
George Alexander v. Inland Steel Company, a Corporation
Compare Standard Conveyor Co. v. Scott, 8 Cir., 221 F.2d 460, 463 , certiorari denied 350 U.S. 830 , 76 S.Ct. 62 , 100 L.Ed. 741 , where this court, applying Missouri law, held that the evidence failed to show that a belt-conveyor system was “inherently or imminently dangerous,” so as to come within the exception relaxing the privity requirement. *318 As to the element of privity in actions, on " “warranties,” exceptions generally have .been limited to food and beverage products, with isolated cases involving soap, cosmetics and other such personal items.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mullett
v.
Korth, Collector of Internal Revenue
v.
Korth, Collector of Internal Revenue
No. 148.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 10, 1955.
Shirley P. Jones for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Holland, Ellis N. Slack and Lee A. Jackson for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.