green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.5 score
“the showing by the government must warrant a finding that the amount of the tax evaded is substantial”
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Andrew Tsanas
the showing by the government must warrant a finding that the amount of the tax evaded is substantial
discussed
Cited "see"
Advanced Micro Devices v. Civil Aeronautics Board
See Pan American World Airways v. CAB, 261 F.2d 754 , 757 (D.C.Cir.1958) (“The Board ‘must find what the statute requires it to find, not in conclusory fashion in the statutory, language but in such fashion that a reviewing court can test the validity of the finding.’ ” (quoting American Airlines v. CAB, 235 F.2d 845 , 853 (D.C.Cir.1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 905 , 77 S.Ct. 668 , 1 L.Ed.2d 666 (1957))), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 590 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
Advanced Micro Devices, Data General Corporation, Electronic Memories & Magnetics Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Co., Intel Corporation, Mostek Corporation, National Semiconductor Corporation, Rca Corporation, Rockwell International and Signetics Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Intervenor. Advanced Micro Devices, Data General Corporation, Electronic Memories & Magnetics Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Co., Intel Corporation, Mostek Corporation, National Semiconductor Corporation, Rca Corporation, Rockwell International and Signetics Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Intervenor
See Pan American World Airways v. CAB, 261 F.2d 754 , 757 (D.C.Cir.1958) ("The Board 'must find what the statute requires it to find, not in conclusory fashion in the statutory language but in such fashion that a reviewing court can test the validity of the finding.' " (quoting American Airlines v. CAB, 235 F.2d 845 , 853 (D.C.Cir.1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 905 , 77 S.Ct. 668 , 1 L.Ed.2d 666 (1957))), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 590 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mitchell
See United States v. Nunan, 236 F.2d 576 (2d Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 912 , 77 S.Ct. 661 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957); United States v. Weber, 197 F.2d 237 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 344 U.S. 834 , 73 S.Ct. 42 , 97 L.Ed. 649 (1952).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dunham Concrete Products, Inc., Louisiana Ready-Mix Co., Inc., Anderson-Dunham, Inc., and Ted F. Dunham, Jr
See United States v. Nunan, 236 F.2d 576 (2d Cir.1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 912 (1957); see also Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339 (1958) (illegally obtained evidence); Coppedge v. United States, 311 F.2d 128 (D.C.Cir.1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 946 (1963) (perjured testimony).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dunham Concrete Products, Inc.
See United States v. Nunan, 236 F.2d 576 (2d Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 912 , 77 S.Ct. 661 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957); see also Lawn v. United States, 355 U.S. 339 , 78 S.Ct. 311 , 2 L.Ed.2d 321 (1958) (illegally obtained evidence); Coppedge v. United States, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 79 , 311 F.2d 128 (1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 946 , 83 S.Ct. 1541 , 10 L.Ed.2d 701 (1963) (perjured testimony).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Rifkin
See United States v. Nunan, 236 F.2d 576, 586 (2d Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 912 , 77 S.Ct. 661 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957); Buttermore v. United States, 180 F.2d 853, 855 (6th Cir. 1950).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Edwin Murray
See United States v. Nunan, 236 F.2d 576, 588 (2 Cir.1956), cert. denied 353 U.S. 912 , 77 S.Ct. 661 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Associated Resources Corp.
v.
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.
v.
Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co.
No. 776.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 25, 1957.
Jack Z. Krigel for petitioners. Robert 0. Brown, Robert E. Rice, William S. Hogsett and Hale Houts for respondent.
Published
Citer courts: Second Circuit (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.