green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Blair v. United States
See Anderson v. United States, 138 Ct.Cl. 192, 195 , 150 F.Supp. 881, 883 (1957), cert. denied 355 U.S. 822 , 78 S.Ct. 31 , 2 L.Ed.2d 37 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Corning Glass Works v. Federal Trade Commission
See General Electric Co. v. Masters Mail Order Co., 244 F.2d 681, 684 (2d Cir. 1957), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 824 , 78 S.Ct. 32 , 2 L.Ed.2d 39 ; Revere Camera Co. v. Masters Mail Order Co., 128 F.Supp. 457 (D.Md. 1955). 25 .
examined
Cited "see"
Henderson Clay Products v. United States
(4×)
See United States v. Cherokee Brick and Tile Co., 5 Cir., 1955, 218 F.2d 424 , United States v. Merry Brothers Brick and Tile Company, 5 Cir. 1957, 247 F.2d 708 , cert. denied 1957, 355 U.S. 824 , 78 S.Ct. 31 , 2 L.Ed.2d 38 . 5 On September 26, 1961, Congress passed a statute which offered to brick and tile manufacturers an option to compute their taxes in a different manner.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Merry Brothers Brick & Tile Co.
v.
Merry Brothers Brick & Tile Co.
No. 220.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1957.
Attorney General Brownell, Acting Assistant Attorney General Stull and Harry Baum for petitioners. William M. Fulcher for the Merry Brothers Brick & Tile Co., Charles D. Turner for the Reliance Clay Products Co., William S. Pritchard and Winston B. McCall for the Estate of Stephenson et al., William A. Sutherland for the Tupelo Brick & Tile Co. et al., Harry C. Weeks, Benjamin L. Bird and Joseph B. Brennan for the Acme Brick Co., Franklin Spafford for Kirby et al., Charles J. Bloch and Mr. Brennan for the Cherokee Brick & Tile Co., Fur-man Smith for the Chattahoochee Brick Co., Allen Post for the Atlanta Brick & Tile Co., Wallace Miller, Jr. for the Burns Brick Co., and Howard P. Travis for the Texas Vitrified Pipe Co., respondents.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.