green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1959 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1959
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United New York Sandy Hook Pilots Association v. Rodermond Industries, Inc.
See Oroz v. American President Lines, Ltd., 259 F.2d 636 (C.A.2, 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 584 , 3 L.Ed.2d 572 (1959); Prol v. Holland-America Line, 234 F.Supp. 530 (S.D.N.Y.1964).
cited
Cited "see"
United New York Sandy Hook Pilots Ass'n v. Rodermond Industries, Inc.
See Oroz v. American President Lines, Ltd., 259 F.2d 636 (C.A.2, 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 584 , 3 L.Ed.2d 572 (1959); Prol v. Holland-America Line, 234 F.Supp. 530 (S.D.N.Y.1964).
examined
Cited "see"
Cleary Brothers, Inc. v. Luria Steel & Trading Corp.
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Oroz v. American President Lines, 2 Cir., 259 F.2d 636, 639 , certiorari denied 359 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 584 , 3 L.Ed.2d 572 ; Le Gate v. The Panamolga, 2 Cir., 221 F.2d 689 ; Schiavone-Bonomo Corp. v. Buffalo Barge Towing Corp., 2 Cir., 132 F.2d 766 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Paoletta v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
See also, Stampolis v. Lewis, 186 Pa. Super. 285, 288 , 142 A.2d 348, 349 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 907 , 79 S. Ct. 582 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Deane v. Dunbar
Compare Mattox v. United States, 146 U.S. 140 , 13 S.Ct. 50 , 36 L.Ed. 917 (1892) (improper influence of jury bailiff and newspaper article), and United States v. Pleva, 66 F.2d 529 (2d Cir.1933) (coercion resulting from illness), with United States v. Grieco, 261 F.2d 414 (2d Cir.1958) (per curiam) (tolerable persuasion), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 907 , 79 S.Ct. 582 , 3 L.Ed.2d 572 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Deane v. Dunbar
Compare Mattox v. United States, 146 U.S. 140 , 13 S.Ct. 50 , 36 L.Ed. 917 (1892) (improper influence of jury bailiff and newspaper article), and United States v. Pleva, 66 F.2d 529 (2d Cir.1933) (coercion resulting from illness), with United States v. Grieco, 261 F.2d 414 (2d Cir.1958) (per curiam) (tolerable persuasion), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 907 , 79 S.Ct. 582 , 3 L.Ed.2d 572 (1959).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Francis v. Pan American Trinidad Oil Company
See, e.g., Oroz v. American President Lines, Ltd., 259 F.2d 636 (2nd Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 584 , 3 L.Ed.2d 572 (1959).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gault v. Poor Sisters Of St. Frances Seraph Of The Perpetual Adoration
See also United States v. Grieco, 2 Cir., 261 F.2d 414 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 907 , 79 S.Ct. 582 , 3 L.Ed.2d 572 (1959); Jorgensen v. York Ice & Machinery Corporation, 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 432 (1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 764 , 68 S.Ct. 69 , 92 L.Ed. 349 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gault v. Poor Sisters of St. Frances Seraph of the Perpetual Adoration, Inc.
See also United States v. Grieco, 2 Cir., 261 F.2d 414 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 907 , 79 S.Ct. 582 , 3 L.Ed.2d 572 (1959); Jorgensen v. York Ice & Machinery Corporation, 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 432 (1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 764 , 68 S.Ct. 69 , 92 L.Ed. 349 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit
See also United States v. Grieco, 2 Cir., 261 F.2d 414 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 907 , 79 S.Ct. 582 , 3 L.Ed.2d 572 (1959); Jorgensen v. York Ice & Machinery Corporation, 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 432 (1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 764 , 68 S.Ct. 69 , 92 L.Ed. 349 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lester E. Butler v. United States
See also United States v. Grieco, 2 Cir., 261 F.2d 414 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 907 , 79 S.Ct. 582 , 3 L.Ed.2d 572 (1959); Jorgensen v. York Ice & Machinery Corporation, 2 Cir., 160 F.2d 432 (1947), cert. denied, 332 U.S. 764 , 68 S.Ct. 69 , 92 L.Ed. 349 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alberts v. American President Lines, Ltd.
See, e. g., Oroz v. American President Lines, Ltd., 259 F.2d 636, 639 (2d Cir., 1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 908 , 79 S.Ct. 584 , 3 L.Ed.2d 572 (1959); but cf. Seals v. State Marine Lines, Inc., 188 F.Supp. 398 (E.D.La., 1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Consolidated Electric Lamp Co.
v.
Mitchell, Secretary of Labor
v.
Mitchell, Secretary of Labor
No. 590.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1959.
Gerard D. Reilly for petitioners., Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Samuel D. Slade, Stuart Rothman and Bessie Margolin for the Secretary of Labor, respondent.
Published
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.