Pewee Coal Co. v. United States, 359 U.S. 912 (1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Pewee Coal Co. v. United States, 359 U.S. 912 (1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Advanced Micro Devices, Data General Corporation, Electronic Memories & Magnetics Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Co., Intel Corporation, Mostek Corporation, National Semiconductor Corporation, Rca Corporation, Rockwell International and Signetics Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Intervenor. Advanced Micro Devices, Data General Corporation, Electronic Memories & Magnetics Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Co., Intel Corporation, Mostek Corporation, National Semiconductor Corporation, Rca Corporation, Rockwell International and Signetics Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Intervenor (cadc, 1984-09-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Advanced Micro Devices, Data General Corporation, Electronic Memories & Magnetics Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Co., Intel Corporation, Mostek Corporation, National Semiconductor Corporation, Rca Corporation, Rockwell International and Signetics Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Intervenor. Advanced Micro Devices, Data General Corporation, Electronic Memories & Magnetics Corporation, Hewlett-Packard Co., Intel Corporation, Mostek Corporation, National Semiconductor Corporation, Rca Corporation, Rockwell International and Signetics Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Intervenor
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pan American World Airways v. CAB, 261 F.2d 754 , 757 (D.C.Cir.1958) ("The Board 'must find what the statute requires it to find, not in conclusory fashion in the statutory language but in such fashion that a reviewing court can test the validity of the finding.' " (quoting American Airlines v. CAB, 235 F.2d 845 , 853 (D.C.Cir.1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 905 , 77 S.Ct. 668 , 1 L.Ed.2d 666 (1957))), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 590 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959).
discussed Cited "see" Advanced Micro Devices v. Civil Aeronautics Board
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pan American World Airways v. CAB, 261 F.2d 754 , 757 (D.C.Cir.1958) (“The Board ‘must find what the statute requires it to find, not in conclusory fashion in the statutory, language but in such fashion that a reviewing court can test the validity of the finding.’ ” (quoting American Airlines v. CAB, 235 F.2d 845 , 853 (D.C.Cir.1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 905 , 77 S.Ct. 668 , 1 L.Ed.2d 666 (1957))), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 590 , 3 L.Ed.2d 575 (1959).
cited Cited "see" Louis Y. Wilson v. Sam Anderson
D.C. Cir. · 1964 · signal: see · confidence high
See the statement of three judges on the petition for rehearing en banc in Lloyd v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 48 , 259 F.2d 334 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 593 (1959).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." BMY—Combat Systems Division of Harsco Corp. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 1997 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see also Pewee Coal Co. v. United States, 142 Ct.Cl. 796, 806 , 161 F.Supp. 952 (1958) (referring to the forfeiture statute as “harsh”), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 588 , 3 L.Ed.2d 574 (1959).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United States
1st Cir. · 1965 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e. g., Pewee Coal Co. v. United States, 161 F.Supp. 952, 958 , 142 Ct.Cl. 796, 806 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 912 , 79 S.Ct. 588 , 3 L.Ed.2d 574 (1959); Kamen Soap Products Co. v. United States, 124 F.Supp. 608, 620 , 129 Ct.Cl. 619, 641 (1954). 39 For the same reasons, a related defense asserted by the Government must likewise fail.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Acme Process Equipment Co. v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1965 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Pewee Coal Co. v. United States, 142 Ct. Cl. 796, 806 , 161 F. Supp. 952, 958 (1958), cert. denied, 359 U.S. 912 (1959); Kamen Soap Products Co. v. United States, 129 Ct. Cl. 619, 641 , 124 F. Supp. 608, 620 (1954).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pewee Coal Co., Inc.
v.
United States
No. 628.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1959.
359 U.S. 912
Martin Emilius Carlson for petitioner., Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Court of Claims. Certiorari denied.