green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Claude Jason Lewis v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State Penitentiary
But see Geise v. United States, 265 F.2d 659 (9 Cir. 1959), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 , 80 S.Ct. 94 , 4 L.Ed.2d 80 , and United States v. Sorrentino, 175 F.2d 721 (3 Cir. 1949), cert. denied, 338 U.S. 868 , 70 S.Ct. 143 , 94 L.Ed. 532 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Ramon Hernandez, United States of America v. Jesus Antonio Gastelum, Charged as Raymond Sepulveda Mendoza, United States of America v. Jorge Mejia, United States of America v. Javier Gomez
Orlando v. Fay, supra, 350 F.2d at 971 ; Accord, Geise v. United States, 262 F.2d 151, 156-57 (9th Cir. 1958), Cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 , 80 S.Ct. 94 , 4 L.Ed.2d 80 (1959) (exclusion power to prevent pressures or embarrassment to young witnesses and young victim in rape prosecution). 23 An accommodation must be made of the individual's right to a public trial and those societal interests that might justify closing the courtroom to the public.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hernandez
Orlando v. Fay, supra, 350 F.2d at 971 ; accord, Geise v. United States, 262 F.2d 151, 156-57 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 , 80 S.Ct. 94 , 4 L.Ed.2d 80 (1959) (exclusion power to prevent pressures or embarrassment to young witnesses and young victim in rape prosecution).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Latimore
(2×)
See United States v. Geise, 262 F.2d 151 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 , 80 S.Ct. 94 , 4 L.Ed.2d 80 (1959); Hogan v. State, 191 Ark. 437 , 86 S.W.2d 931 (1935).” (361 F.2d @ 891.) See also State v. Purvis (1968), 157 Conn. 198 , 251 A.2d 178 , cert. denied, 395 U.S. 928 ; Price v. State (Tex. Crim.
discussed
Cited "see"
Price v. State
See United States v. Geise, 262 F.2d 151 (9th Cir.1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 , 80 S.Ct. 94 , 4 L.Ed.2d 80 (1959); Hogan v. State, 191 Ark. 437 , 86 S.W.2d 931 (1935).” Although the prosecutrix was not of tender years 1 but was a young adult woman, it was within the sound discretion of the trial judge, subject to review on appeal for possible abuse, to decide on the exigencies of the occasion.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lawrence
(2×)
See United States v. Geise, 262 F.2d 151 (9th Cir. [Alaska] 1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 , 80 S.Ct. 94 , 4 L.Ed.2d 80 (1959); Hogan v. State, 191 Ark. 437 , 86 S.W.2d 931 (1935).” The court concluded: “petitioners were afforded a fair and impartial trial, and their constitutional rights meticulously safeguarded throughout.” In Geise v. United States (same case as United States v. Geise, just cited) the trial court, over defendant’s objection, excluded from a trial for statutory rape of a girl, age 9 at time of trial, all spectators except members of the press and bar and relatives…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Purvis
Ed. 2d 113 ; see United States v. Geise, 262 F.2d 151, 155 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 , 80 S. Ct. 94 , 4 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Maryann Weissman and Key Martin v. United States
See In re United Press Associations v. Valente, 308 N.Y. 71 , 123 N.E.2d 777 , and Geise v. United States, 9 Cir., 265 F.2d 659, 660 , cert. denied 361 U.S. 842 , 80 S.Ct. 94 , 4 L.Ed.2d 80 . 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Albert Harris v. Dan D. Stephens, Superintendent of Arkansas State Penitentiary, Orion Trotter v. Dan D. Stephens, Superintendent of Arkansas State Penitentiary
See United States v. Geise, 262 F.2d 151 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 , 80 S.Ct. 94 , 4 L.Ed.2d 80 (1959); Hogan v. State, 191 Ark. 437 , 86 S.W.2d 931 (1935). 11 After having reviewed the record evidence, 5 we agree with Chief Justice Harris of the Arkansas Supreme Court, who stated: 12 "Here, there is not one line of evidence in the record which indicates that appellant could not receive a fair trial in Drew County, and we certainly cannot say that the court abused its discretion in refusing to grant the motion." Trotter v. State, supra, 237 Ark. at 831 , 377 S.W.2d at 21 .
cited
Cited "see"
Harris v. Stephens
See United States v. Geise, 262 F.2d 151 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 , 80 S.Ct. 94 , 4 L.Ed.2d 80 (1959); Hogan v. State, 191 Ark. 437 , 86 S.W.2d 931 (1935).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Burney
See, e.g., Geise v. United States, 262 F. 2d 151 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 (1959); Hogan v. State, 191 Ark. 437 , 86 S.W-.2d 931 (1935); Beauchamp v. Cahill, 297 Ky. 505 , 180 S.W.2d 423 (1944).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Stevens
See also Geise v. United States, 262 F.2d 151 (9th Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 (1959); Melanson v. O’Brien, 191 F.2d 963 (1st Cir. 1951).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Drewey Aaron, Jr. v. Walter Capps, Warden, Draper Prison, Elmore, Alabama
Compare Tanksley v. United States, 9 Cir., 1944, 145 F.2d 58 , 10 Alaska 443 , with Harris v. Stephens, 8 Cir., 1966, 361 F.2d 888 , 891, cert. denied, 386 U.S. 964 , 87 S.Ct. 1040 , 18 L.Ed.2d 113 (1967), and United States v. Geise, 9 Cir., 1958, 262 F.2d 151 , cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 , 80 S.Ct. 94 , 4 L.Ed.2d 80 (1959) (latter cases holding it proper to close courtrooms to certain spectators in rape trials).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Smallwood v. LaValle
Compare Tanksley v. United States, 145 F.2d 58 , 10 Alaska 443 (9 Cir. 1944), with Geise v. United States, 262 F.2d 151 (9 Cir. 1958), rehearing denied, 265 F.2d 659 , cert. denied, 361 U.S. 842 , 80 S.Ct. 94 , 4 L.Ed.2d 80 (1959). 8 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Williams
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 26.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1959.
361 U.S. 842
Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia. Dubrovsky for the United States. -
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.