green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1960 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1960
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Pollock v. Patuxent Institution Board of Review
See Bernstein v. Real Estate Comm’n, 221 Md. 221 , 156 A.2d 657 (1959), appeal dismissed, 363 U.S. 419 , 80 S.Ct. 1257 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1515 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Insurance Service Management, Inc. v. Muhl
See, in general, Bernstein v. Real Estate Comm’n, 221 Md. 221 , 156 A.2d 657 (1959), app. dism. 363 U.S. 419 , 80 S.Ct. 1257 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1515 (1960).
cited
Cited "see"
Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Malakoff
See Bernstein v. Real Estate Comm., 221 Md. 221, 230 , 156 A. 2d 657, 662 (1959), appeal dismissed, 363 U. S. 419 , 80 S. Ct. 1257 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1515 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
Meehan v. Macy
See Bernstein v. Real Estate Commission of Maryland, 221 Md. 221, 230 , 156 A. 2d 657, 661-2 (1959), appeal dismissed, 363 U. S. 419 , 80 S. Ct. 1257 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1515 , reh. den. 364 U. S. 855 , 81 S. Ct. 35 , 5 L.Ed.2d 79 , and prior cases cited in the opinion in that case.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Appeal of Kelly
Social Security and Public Welfare § 278(a) (1977); see, e.g., Bernstein v. Real Estate Comm., 221 Md. 221, 232 , 156 A.2d 657, 663 (1959) (degree of proof to establish a case is the same in an administrative as in a civil judicial proceeding, that being a preponderance of the evidence), appeal dismissed, 363 U.S. 419 , reh’g denied, 364 U.S. 855 (1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BERNSTEIN ET AL.
v.
REAL ESTATE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND ET AL.
v.
REAL ESTATE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND ET AL.
852.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 13, 1960.
Per Curiam.
Published
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND.
J. Calvin Carney and William H. Murphy for appellants.
C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Commission.
Melvin J. Sykes for appellees Allendale-Lyndhurst Improvement Assn., Inc., Allen Kleiman et ux. and Bernard Cherry et ux.; and David Kimmelman of counsel for appellees Kleiman and Cherry.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.