Robinson v. United States, 364 U.S. 919 (1960). · Go Syfert
Search
Robinson v. United States, 364 U.S. 919 (1960). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
49 citation events across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Target Sportswear, Inc. v. United States (cit, 1995-07-25)
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961 1993 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Target Sportswear, Inc. v. United States
Ct. Intl. Trade · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Mangano Cycles Co., 47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750, 1960 WL 8527 , cert. denied, 364 U.S. 919 , 81 S.Ct. 283 , 5 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960); United States v. Best Foods, Inc., 47 CCPA 163, C.A.D. 751, 1960 WL 8510 (1960); Luggage & Leather Goods Manufacturers of America, Inc. v. United States, 7 CIT 258 , 588 F.Supp. 1413 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harry R. Haldeman, United States of America v. John D. Ehrlichman, United States of America v. John N. Mitchell, United States of America v. Harry R. Haldeman and John D. Ehrlichman, Nos. 75-1381, 75-1382, 75-1384 and 76-1441.united States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
D.C. Cir. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
See Robinson v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 23-24, 283 F.2d 508, 509-510 , cert. denied, 364 U.S. 919 , 81 S.Ct. 282 , 5 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960). 233 The determination of a District Judge to admit tape recordings rests in his sound discretion.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Haldeman
D.C. Cir. · 1976 · signal: see · confidence high
See Robinson v. United States, 109 U.S.App.D.C. 22 , 23-24, 283 F.2d 508, 509-510 , ce rt. denied, 364 U.S. 919 , 81 S.Ct. 282 , 5 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960).
discussed Cited "see" Yoshida International, Inc. v. United States (2×)
Cust. Ct. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., 47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750 (1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 919 , 81 S.Ct. 283 , 5 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Inter Maritime Forwarding Co. v. United States
Cust. Ct. · 1962 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare U.S. v. Schmidt Pritchard & Co., 47 CCPA 152, CAD 750, aff’g 41 CCR 108, CD 2029, cert. den., 364 US 919 , 5 L. ed. (2d) 259, 81 S. Ct. 283 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robinson
v.
United States
No. 485.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 12, 1960.
364 U.S. 919
De Long Harris for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.