green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Tom Don Franano v. United States
But see United States v. Kravitz, 3 Cir., 281 F.2d 581 (1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 941 , 81 S.Ct. 459 , 5 L.Ed.2d 372 (1961) [although the case was reversed on other grounds as to a co-defendant]; North-craft v. United States, supra, 271 F.2d 184 ; Stoneking v. United States, supra, 232 F.2d 385 ; Myres v. United States, supra, 174 F.2d 329 ; and Buchanan v. United States, supra, 15 F.2d 496 , where it was held that the judge’s comments did not require reversal.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eugene Gaines, in 19405
See United States v. Kravitz, 281 F.2d 581 , 584 n. 4 (3 Cir. 1960, cert, den., 364 U.S. 941 , 81 S.Ct. 459 , 5 L.E.2d 372 (1961)), in which this Court upheld the statement: “Let me say quite frankly to you that I do not believe Joseph Abrams absolutely and in all respects.” The remark in the present case to which Mr. Dent objects is. stated in considerably weaker language.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eric J. Monaghan
(2×)
They constituted "an appeal wholly irrelevant to any facts or issues in the case, the purpose and effect of which could only have been to arouse passion and prejudice." Id. at 247 , 63 S.Ct. at 566 . 26 Berger v. United States, 295 U.S. 78, 88 , 55 S.Ct. 629, 633 , 79 L.Ed. 1314 (1935) 27 416 U.S. 637, 646-47 , 94 S.Ct. 1868, 1872-73 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974) (quoting Miller v. Pate, 386 U.S. 1, 6 , 87 S.Ct. 785, 787 , 17 L.Ed.2d 690 (1967); see also United States v. Kravitz, 281 F.2d 581 (3d Cir.1960), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 941 , 81 S.Ct. 459 , 5 L.Ed.2d 372 (1961): We think little of the word…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Washington
(2×)
(People v. Dozier, supra; People v. Daboul, 234 Cal.App.2d 800, 803-804 [ 44 Cal.Rptr. 744 ]; see also People v. Terry, 180 Cal.App.2d 48, 57 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 597 ], cert.den. 364 U.S. 941 [ 5 L.Ed.2d 372 , 81 S.Ct. 458 ].
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Wade
See, e. g., Griffith v. Rhay, 282 F. 2d 711 (9 Cir. 1960), cert. denied 364 U. S. 941 , 81 S. Ct. 460 , 5 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William J. Jackson v. United States
(2×)
See also United States v. Magin, 280 F.2d 74 (7th Cir. 1960), cert. denied 364 U.S. 914 , 81 S.Ct. 271 , 5 L.Ed.2d 228 , rehearing denied 364 U.S. 944 , 81 S.Ct. 458 , 5 L.Ed.2d 375 (1961), where the District Court, citing Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States, 360 U.S. 395 , 79 S.Ct. 1237 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1323 , said: “It is established that the burden is on the defense to show that a particularized need exists for the minutes which outweighs the policy of secrecy.” 280 F.2d at page 79 .
Terry
v.
California
v.
California
No. 465.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 16, 1961.
Russell E. Parsons for petitioner. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Jack K. Weber, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District. Certiorari denied.