green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1961 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1961
1993
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond Coriolan and Willy Bonannee v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
(2×)
See Paul v. INS, 521 F.2d 194, 197 (5th Cir. 1975), quoting Kan Ng v. Pilliod, 279 F.2d 207 , 210 (7th Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 860 , 81 S.Ct. 828 , 5 L.Ed.2d 828 (1961); Kovac v. INS, 407 F.2d 102, 104 (9th Cir. 1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
McIver v. Commissioner
Kimbrell v. Commissioner, 371 F. 2d 897 , 902 (C.A. 5); see Jaeger Motor Car Co. v. Commissioner, 284 F. 2d 127 , 135 (C.A. 7), affirming a Memorandum Opinion of this Court, certiorari denied 365 U.S. 860 ; cf. Moke Epstein, Inc. v. Commissioner, 29 T.C. 1005 .
cited
Cited "see"
Francisco Torres Ramos v. Continental Insurance Company
See Fonseca v. Prann, 282 F.2d 153 (1st Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 860 , 81 S.Ct. 826 , 5 L.Ed.2d 822 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lam Leung Kam v. Esperdy
The Regulations further provide, 8 C.F.R. § 103.5 , that “The filing of a motion to reopen or a motion to reconsider or of a subsequent application after notice of denial shall not, unless the Service directs otherwise, serve to stay the execution of any decision made in the case or to extend a previously set departure date.” Against such a background, the plaintiffs, in order to obtain a stay of deportation, bear the burden of showing that their applications have merit, that reopening of their proceedings is likely to result in a stay of deportation, and that it was an abuse of discretio…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Local Finance Corp. v. Commissioner
(2×)
See also Jaeger Motor Car Co. v. Commissioner , 284 F. 2d 127 (C.A. 7, 1960), affirming a Memorandum Opinion of this Court, certiorari denied 365 U.S. 860 (1961) , Moke Epstein, Inc ., 29 T.C. 1005 (1958) ; and Ray Waits Motors v. United States , 145 F. Supp. 269 (E.D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Flores
v.
Prann
v.
Prann
No. 709.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 27, 1961.
Max Goldman for petitioners., Sydney Krause for San Juan Dredging Corp., respondent.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: S.D. West Virginia (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.