Cutlip v. Adams, 365 U.S. 890 (1961). · Go Syfert
Search
Cutlip v. Adams, 365 U.S. 890 (1961). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the claims made in the patent are the sole measure of the grant”
59 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 33 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ab Iro v. Otex, Inc. (scd, 1983-04-18)
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963 1994 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ab Iro v. Otex, Inc.
D.S.C. · 1983 · signal: accord · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
the claims made in the patent are the sole measure of the grant
discussed Cited "see" Structure Probe, Inc. v. Franklin Institute
E.D. Pa. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
Among the reasons for this determination are the following: (1) defendant was the first SEM service operating within a considerable distance of Philadelphia, and necessarily had a natural monopoly over that business in any alleged Delaware Valley market; see, Union Leader Corp. v. Newspapers of New England, Inc., 284 F.2d 582, 584 (1st Cir. 1960), cert. denied, 365 U.S. 833 , 81 S.Ct. 747 , 5 L.Ed.2d 744 , reh. denied, 365 U.S. 890, 81 S.Ct. 1026 , 6 L.Ed.2d 201 (1961); see also, Venzie Corp. v. United States Mineral Prod.
discussed Cited "see" George Harrison Flynn v. United States
3rd Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Green v. United States, 365 U.S. 301, 306 , 81 S.Ct. 653, 656 , 5 L.Ed.2d 670 , rehearing denied 365 U.S. 890 , 81 S.Ct. 1024 , 6 L.Ed.2d 201 (1961), where the court said: “Plainly enough, the intention of the district judge was to impose the maximum sentence of twenty-five years for aggravated bank robbery, and the formal defect in his procedure should not vitiate his considered judgment.” The inadvertent reference in the 4/20/67 Memorandum to the offense in Count II as being a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (b) (rather than § 2113(a)) was at the most harmless error.
discussed Cited "see" The Associated Press v. Taft-Ingalls Corporation, Formerly Known as the Cincinnati Times-Star Company (2×)
6th Cir. · 1965 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jerrold Electronics Corp., 187 F.Supp. 545, 559, n. 25 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d, per curiam, 365 U. S. 567 , 81 S.Ct. 755 , 5 L.Ed.2d 806 , rehearing denied, 365 U.S. 890 , 81 S.Ct. 1026 , 6 L.Ed.2d 200 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. John Donald Cairns
9th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Robles v. United States, 279 F.2d 401 (9th Cir. 1960). cert. denied, 365 U.S. 836 , 81 S.Ct. 750 , 5 L.Ed.2d 745 (1961), reb. denied. 365 U.S. 890 . 81 S.Ct. 1032 , 0 L.Ed.2d 201 (1961) (handwriting); United States v. Pisano, 193 F.2d 301 (7th Cir. 1951) (fingerprints).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cutlip
v.
Adams, Warden
No. 803.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 17, 1961.
365 U.S. 890
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 58%
Citer courts: D. South Carolina (1)

The motion to substitute Otto C. Boles in the place of D. E. Adams as the party respondent is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia denied.