green
Positive treatment
6.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Alexander v. City of Syracuse
Neither the duration of the time that the house was secured nor the time that Gilhooley took to prepare his warrant application violated the Fourth Amendment. 11 Segura, 368 U.S. at 801. 12 Id. at 812-13. 16 Furthermore, no case has established a rule that an officer acts unreasonably when, having secured the scene of a brutal crime at 6:50 in the evening, he does not apply for a search warrant until 8:30 the following morning. 13 Gilhooley was protected by the defense of qualified immunity. 14 See Mullinex, 577 U.S. at 11-12 . (4) Unlawful search of upstairs rooms in the house The Court appa…
discussed
Cited "see"
Fred Sykes v. United States of America, Thomas Ruffin v. United States
See Jones v. United States, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 345 , 262 F.2d 234 (1958), reversed 362 U.S. 257 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960), dismissed 368 U.S. 801 , 82 S.Ct. 20 , 7 L.Ed.2d 15 (1961), conviction affirmed after remand, D.C.Cir., 304 F.2d 381 (1962); Woods v. United States, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 351 , 240 F.2d 37 (1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 941 , 77 S.Ct. 815 , 1 L.Ed.2d 760 (1957), cert. denied, Curtis v. United States, 354 U.S. 926 , 77 S.Ct. 1385 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1438 (1957).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Antipas
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 42.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 23, 1961.
Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Published
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. June 23, 1961. Dismissed pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.