green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1962 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1962
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Daniel
Krull, 480 U.S. at 347 , 107 S.Ct. 1160 ; see Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 , reh. denied 368 U.S. 871 , 82 S.Ct. 23 , 7 L.Ed.2d 72 (1961); Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 , 34 S.Ct. 341 , 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914); Martin v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 285 Kan. 625, 640 , 176 P.3d 938 (2008).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Eichholtz
See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), reh'g denied, 368 U.S. 871 , 82 S.Ct. 23 , 7 L.Ed.2d 72 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655 , 81 S.Ct. 1684, 1691 , 6 L.Ed. 2d 1081, 1090 , reh'g denied, 368 U.S. 871 , 82 S.Ct. 23 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 72 (1961).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Garrow
See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961), reh. den., 368 U.S. 871 , 82 S.Ct. 23 , 7 L.Ed.2d 72 . 1.
cited
Cited "see"
Beard v. North Carolina State Bar
See Lathrop v. Donohue, 367 U.S. 820, 881 , 6 L.Ed. 2d 1191, 1227 (Douglas, J., dissenting), reh’g denied, 368 U.S. 871 , 7 L.Ed. 2d 72 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Heiner
(2×)
See Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 , 84 A.L.R.2d 933 , reh. denied 368 U.S. 871 , 82 S.Ct. 23 , 7 L.Ed.2d 72 (1961); and Boyd v. United States, 116 U.S. 616 , 6 S.Ct. 524 , 29 L.Ed. 746 (1886). *636 The overwhelming weight of authority in this country is to the effect that Fourth Amendment protections are not invoked when evidence is obtained by a private individual.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Bartlett
See Mapp v. Ohio (1961), 367 U. S., 643 , rehearing denied, 368 U. S., 871 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ward
(2×)
See also Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643, 655 , 81 S.Ct. 1684, 1691 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961)(Fourth Amendment applicable to states), rehearing denied, 368 U.S. 871 , 82 S.Ct. 23 , 7 L.Ed.2d 72 (1961).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Hamlin
The law at that time was that "[t]he rule which excludes evidence of the confessions of persons charged with crimes, where such confessions have been made under the influence of threats or promises, has never been held to exclude evidence of any facts which were ascertained in consequence of such confessions. ’’(Duffy v People, 26 NY 588, 590 .) This continued to be the law long after the adoption of the 1894 Constitution, and it was not until the advent of the exclusionary rule that evidence derived from an illegally obtained confession became inadmissible (see, People v Ressler, 17 NY2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Schneider v. Colegio De Abogados De Puerto Rico
In the words of Justice Holmes, however, the determination whether a particular proceeding is judicial or nonjudicial “depends not upon the character of the body but upon the character of the proceedings.” Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co., 211 U.S. 210, 226 , 29 S.Ct. 67, 69 , 53 L.Ed. 150 (1908); see also Lathrop v. Donahue, 367 U.S. 820, 824 , 81 S.Ct. 1826, 1828 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1191 , reh’g denied, 368 U.S. 871 , 82 S.Ct. 23 , 7 L.Ed.2d 72 (1961).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Communist Party of the United States
v.
Subversive Activities Control Board
v.
Subversive Activities Control Board
No. 12.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1961.
368 U.S. 871
Published
367 U. S. 1. Tbe motion for issuance of mandate in addition to certified copy of judgment is granted. Petition for rehearing denied.