Bel Oil Corp. v. Cocreham, 371 U.S. 2 (1962). · Go Syfert
Bel Oil Corp. v. Cocreham, 371 U.S. 2 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mills v. Leguen (nvd, 2025-05-19)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Mills v. Leguen
D. Nev. · 2025 · confidence medium
Under Rule 15(a), a court 25 should “freely” give leave to amend “when justice so requires,” and in the absence of a reason 26 such as “undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive of the part of the movant, repeated failure to 27 cure deficiencies by amendment previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by 28 1 virtue of allowance of the amendment, futility of the amendment, etc.” Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 2 178, 182 (1962). 3 III.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Reilly v. Adventist Health
E.D. Cal. · 2020 · confidence medium
As noted above, 25 however, Courts may properly decline to grant leave to amend where amendment would be futile 26 and where “there is strong evidence of ‘undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the 27 movant, repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice 1 Sonoma County Ass’n of Retired Employees, 708 F.3d at 1117 (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 2 178, 182 (1962) (brackets original). 3 Accordingly, the Court grants leave to amend Count I and Count II consistent with the 4 findings set forth in this Order, except that leave to …
discussed Cited "see" Maryland v. Louisiana (2×)
SCOTUS · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bel Oil Corp. v. Roland, 242 La. 498 , 137 So. 2d 308 , appeal dism'd, 371 U. S. 2 (1962); Edwards v. Parker, 332 So.2d 175 (La. 1976).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In the Matter of Yonathan Donaldo Santos Zelaya v. Daniel A. Brightman, in his official capacity as Field Office Director of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Enforcement and Removal Operations San Diego Field, Office, et al.
S.D. Cal. · 2026 · signal: see also · confidence medium
Legal Standard 26 District courts may exercise jurisdiction over habeas petitions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 27 § 2241 where the petitioner “is in custody in violation of the Constitution and laws or 28 treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (c) (“The writ of habeas corpus shall not 1 extend to a prisoner unless [h]e is in custody.”); see also Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 2 236, 240 (1963) (“History, usage, and precedent can leave no doubt that, besides physical 3 imprisonment, there are other restraints on a man’s liberty, restraints not shared by the 4 public generally, w…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bel Oil Corp.
v.
Cocreham, Collector of Revenue of Louisiana
123.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1962.
371 U.S. 2
Howard B. Gist for appellant., Chapman L. Sanford for appellee.
Goldberg.
Published
Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.