Atl. Coast Line R.R. v. United States, 371 U.S. 6 (1962). · Go Syfert
Search
Atl. Coast Line R.R. v. United States, 371 U.S. 6 (1962). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ackerman v. Kuloloia (nvd, 2025-09-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Ackerman v. Kuloloia
D. Nev. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence medium
“Five factors are taken into account to assess 27 the propriety of a motion for leave to amend: bad faith, undue delay, prejudice to the opposing 1 Desertrain v. City of Los Angeles, 754 F.3d 1147, 1154 (9th Cir. 2014) (citing Johnson v. 2 Buckley, 356 F.3d 1067 , 1077 (9th Cir. 2004)); see also Eminence Capital, LLC, 316 F.3d at 1052 3 (“undue delay, bad faith or dilatory motive on the part of the movant, repeated failure to cure 4 deficiencies by amendments previously allowed, undue prejudice to the opposing party by virtue 5 of allowance of the amendment, futility of amendment, etc.”)…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO.
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 247.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 8, 1962.
371 U.S. 6
Albert B. Russ, Jr., C. Baxter Jones, Herman Heyman, W. L. Grubbs, Prime F. Osborn and Homer S. Carpenter for appellants., Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Robert B. Hummel, Elliott H. Moyer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., Charles J. Bloch, Henry J. Karison and R. Granville Curry for appellee carriers.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.