green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Pranke
(2×)
As stated in People v. Sesslin, 68 Cal.2d 418, 428 [ 67 Cal.Rptr. 409 , 439 P.2d 321 ]: “That degree of ‘attenuation’ which suffices to remove the taint from evidence obtained directly as a result of unlawful police conduct requires at least an intervening independent act by the defendant or a third party which breaks the causal chain linking the illegality and evidence in such a way that the evidence is not in fact obtained ‘by exploitation of that illegality.’ Consent by the defendant, if ‘sufficiently an act of free will to purge the primary taint of the unlawful [arrest]’ (Wo…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tom E. Tiler, Roy Y. Sakai and Ty-Sak Agencies, Ltd.
See note 2, supra. While there is some support for the power to require security for payment in advance of a final determination of actual damages, see United States v. Taylor, 305 F.2d 183, 188 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 894 , 83 S.Ct. 193 , 9 L.Ed.2d 126 (1962), generally restitution payments have been ordered only after actual damages have either been finally determined or formally conceded.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard v. Caiello
(2×)
See United States v. Taylor, 305 F.2d 183, 187 (4th Cir.), cert. denied 371 U.S. 894 , 83 S.Ct. 193 , 9 L.Ed.2d 126 (1962), rehearing denied, 371 U.S. 943 , 83 S.Ct. 322 , 9 L.Ed.2d 277 (1962); United States v. Stoehr, 196 F.2d 276 , 33 A.L.R.2d 836 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied Stoehr v. United States, 344 U.S. 826 , 73 S.Ct. 28 , 97 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Johnny Wilson Holland v. United States
Accord, Swanson v. United States, 8 Cir., 1962, 304 F.2d 865 , cert. denied 371 U.S. 894 , 83 S.Ct. 194 , 9 L.Ed.2d 127 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Roach v. Mauldin
See Burrow v. United States, 301 F.2d 442 (8th Cir. 1962), cert. den. 371 U.S. 894 , 83 S.Ct. 193 , 9 L.Ed.2d 126 ; Lebron v. United States, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 133 , 229 F.2d 16 (1955); Williams v. United States, 367 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1966); Cheely v. United States, 367 F.2d 547 (5th Cir. 1966).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Donaldson v. Wyrick
“The controlling consideration is whether or not the defendant was aware and had notice of the sentence which the court intended to impose.” United States v. Price, 257 F.Supp. 493, 496 (W.D.Pa.1966), affirmed, 385 F.2d 839 (3rd Cir. 1967); Young v. United States, 274 F.2d 698 (8th Cir. 1960), affirmed, 366 U.S. 761 , 81 S.Ct. 1670 , 6 L.Ed.2d 853 (1961); see also, Hughes v. United States, 304 F.2d 91 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 894 , 83 S.Ct. 195 , 9 L.Ed.2d 127 (1962).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. McGrew
(2×)
(E.g., People v. Cruz, 61 Cal.2d 861, 866 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 841 , 395 P.2d 889 ] [guest in apartment could not- consent to search of boxes and luggage belonging to others]; People v. Egan, 250 Cal.App.2d 433, 436 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 627 ] [parents could not consent to search of bag where made clear that bag not parents’]; Holzhey v. United States (5th Cir. 1955) 223 F.2d 823, 824 [relatives could not consent to search of locked cabinet]; compare, Sartain v. United States (9th Cir. 1962) 303 F.2d 859, 862-863 , cert, denied, 371 U.S. 894 [ 9 L.Ed.2d 127 , 83 S.Ct. 194 ] [friend could consent to searc…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Perpiglia
v.
Banmiller, Warden
v.
Banmiller, Warden
No. 220, Misc..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 5, 1962.
Published
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Certiorari denied.