green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sears, Roebuck and Co
See Mel Dar Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 309 F.2d 525, 531 (9th Cir.1962) (“All that is necessary for consideration is a forbearance of the right to cancel based on a belief in the existence of the right.”), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 941 , 83 S.Ct. 933 , 9 L.Ed.2d 967 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
See Mel Dar Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 309 F.2d 525, 531 (9th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 941 , 83 S.Ct. 933 , 9 L.Ed.2d 967 (1963); Nyhus v. Travel Management Corp., supra, 466 F.2d at 446 (dicta).
cited
Cited "see"
Nicath Realty Co. v. Commissioner
See Mel Dar Corporation v. Commissioner, 309 F. 2d 525 (C.A. 9, 1962), affirming a Memorandum Opinion of this Court, certiorari denied 372 U.S. 941 (1963) .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Idaho v. United States Department of Army, Corps of Engineers
See also, People of California v. United States, 307 F.2d 941 (CA9 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 941 , 83 S.Ct. 933 , 9 L.Ed.2d 967 (1963).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Idaho ex rel. Trombley v. United States Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
See also, People of California v. United States, 307 F.2d 941 (CA9 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 941 , 83 S.Ct. 933 , 9 L.Ed.2d 967 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Byrum
See, e. g., Honigman v. Green Giant Co., 208 F. Supp. 754 , aff’d, 309 F. 2d 667 (CA8 1962), cert. denied, 372 U. S. 941 (1963); Essex Universal Corp. v. Yates, 305 F. 2d 572 (CA2 1962); Perlman v. Feldmann, 219 F. 2d 173 (CA2 1955). “ [Shareholders in a close corporation are usually vitally interested in maintaining their proportionate control . . . .” 1 F. O’Neal, Close Corporations §3.39, p. 43 (1971).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Transport Manufacturing & Equipment Company, a Delaware Corporation, Transferee v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Transport Manufacturing & Equipment Company, an Illinois Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See e. g., Mel Dar Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 309 F.2d 525 (9 Cir. 1962) cert. denied, 372 U.S. 941 , 83 S.Ct. 933 , 9 L.Ed.2d 967 (1963); International Trading Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 275 F.2d 578 (7 Cir. 1960). 12 The taxpayer additionally asserts that the only direct evidence on the investment motive was from the Riss family and that the conclusion reached by the Tax Court was not permissible under the undisputed evidence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Transport Manufacturing & Equipment Co. v. Commissioner
See e. g., Mel Dar Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 309 F.2d 525 (9 Cir. 1962) cert. denied, 372 U.S. 941 , 83 S.Ct. 933 , 9 L.Ed.2d 967 (1963); International Trading Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 275 F.2d 578 (7 Cir. 1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 666.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1963.
Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, and John Fourt and Robert-H. Connett, Deputy Attorneys General, for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Acting Assistant Attorney General Guiljoyle and Alan S. Rosenthal for the United States.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.