Martin v. United States, 374 U.S. 834 (1963). · Go Syfert
Martin v. United States, 374 U.S. 834 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Louis Wayne Fennell (ca10, 1992-12-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Louis Wayne Fennell
10th Cir. · 1992 · signal: accord · confidence high
The Supreme Court has indicated that at original sentencings trial courts should strictly comply with Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(a)(1)(C), which reads that the court shall "address the defendant personally and determine if the defendant wishes to make a statement and to present any information in mitigation of the sentence." See Green v. United States, 365 U.S. at 305; see also United States v. Gardner, 480 F.2d 929, 932 (10th Cir.) (failure by trial court to follow formal requirements of Rule 32 requires resentencing), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 977 (1973); accord Martin v. United States, 309 F.2d 81, 82 (…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martin
v.
United States
No. 785, Misc..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1963.
374 U.S. 834
Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.