green
Positive treatment
1.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Louis Wayne Fennell
The Supreme Court has indicated that at original sentencings trial courts should strictly comply with Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(a)(1)(C), which reads that the court shall "address the defendant personally and determine if the defendant wishes to make a statement and to present any information in mitigation of the sentence." See Green v. United States, 365 U.S. at 305; see also United States v. Gardner, 480 F.2d 929, 932 (10th Cir.) (failure by trial court to follow formal requirements of Rule 32 requires resentencing), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 977 (1973); accord Martin v. United States, 309 F.2d 81, 82 (…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Martin
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 785, Misc..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1963.
Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and J. F. Bishop for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.