green
Positive treatment
4.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Virgil Alessi v. United States
See United States v. Sobell, 2 Cir., 314 F.2d 314, 321 , cert. denied, 374 U.S. 857 , 83 S.Ct. 1906 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1963); Alfano v. United States, 2 Cir., 555 F.2d 1128, 1130 (1977); Edwards v. United States, 2 Cir., 564 F.2d 652, 654 (1977). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Harding Gallington and Wilbur Eugene Streeter
See, Glouser v. Van Alstine, 313 F.2d 199, 200 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 857 , 83 S.Ct. 1902 , 10 L.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon Horowitz
See United States v. Sobell, 314 F.2d 314, 323-324 , (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 857 , 83 S.Ct. 1906 , 10.
discussed
Cited "see"
Genovese v. United States
See United States v. Sobell, 314 F.2d 314, 322-325 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 857 , 83 S.Ct. 1906 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1963); Kyle v. United States, 266 F.2d 670, 672 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 361 U.S. 870 , 80 S.Ct. 131 , 4 L.Ed.2d 109 (1959).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry I. Horton, Jr.
See United States v. Sobell, 314 F.2d 314 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 857 , 83 S.Ct. 1906 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1963).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wilbert Brown, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Sobell, 314 F.2d 314 , 329 & n. 12 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 857 , 83 S.Ct. 1906 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1963); United States v. Kramer, 289 F.2d 909, 920-21 (2d Cir.1961); but see Jackson v. United States, 221 F.2d 883, 885 (D.C.Cir.1955).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Silverberg
Compare Act of May 23, 1887, P.L. 158, § 10, 19 P.S. § 631 (1964). [10] United States v. Sobell, 314 F.2d 314 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 857 , 83 S.Ct. 1906 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1077 (1963), relied upon by appellees, does not compel a contrary conclusion.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Davis v. United States
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Sobell, 314 F. 2d 314 (CA2), cert. denied, 374 U. S. 857 (1963). [14] It might be argued, of course, that the first paragraph of § 2255 was for some reason designed to permit the filing of motions for relief even in some cases where relief could not be granted under paragraph three.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gem Stores, Inc. v. O'BRIEN
See also Cardinal Sporting Goods Company v. Eagleton, D.C., 213 F.Supp. 207, 219 , decided January 11, 1963, appeal dismissed as moot, 374 U.S. 857 , 83 S.Ct. 1866 , 10 L.Ed.2d 1043 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sobell
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 1333, Misc..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1963.
Eleanor Jackson Piel, Marshall Perlin and Frank J. Bonner for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley, Kevin T. Mároney and Lee B. Anderson for the United States.
Consideration, Motion, Took.
Published
Motion for leave to use the record in Nos. Ill and 112, October Term, 1952, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United-States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Mr. Justice White took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.