Yancy v. California, 375 U.S. 869 (1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Yancy v. California, 375 U.S. 869 (1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“of course, prostitution or such immoral purpose need not be the sole motive for the interstate trip. it is sufficient if it is one of the principal purposes.”
17 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Thong Vang and Neng Vue (ca7, 1997-10-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Thong Vang and Neng Vue
7th Cir. · 1997 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
of course, prostitution or such immoral purpose need not be the sole motive for the interstate trip. it is sufficient if it is one of the principal purposes.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Yancy
v.
California
No. 1.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1963.
375 U.S. 869
Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, and Gordon Ringer and Don G. Kircher, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondents.
Douglas, Granted, Should.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)

District Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.