green
Positive treatment
5.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1963 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1963
1994
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Neuman v. Swiftfunds Financial Services LLC
See Dkt. #8-2. 8 Turning to the reasonableness of hours requested, the party seeking fees “bears the 9 burden of establishing entitlement to an award and documenting the appropriate hours 10 expended and hourly rates.” Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437 , 103 S.Ct. 1933 , 76 11 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lawrence
See State v. Brewer, 258 N.C. 533, 543 , 129 S.E.2d 262, 270 , appeal dismissed, 375 U.S. 9 (1963).
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent R. Perrin, Jr., David L. Levy and Duffy J. Lafont, Jr.
(4×)
See State v. Brewer, 258 N.C. 533 , 129 S.E.2d 262 (1963), app. dismissed, 375 U.S. 9 , 84 S.Ct. 72 , 11 L.Ed.2d 40 (1963); People v. Nankervis, 330 Mich. 17 , 46 N.W.2d 592 (1951); People v. Davis, 33 N.Y.Cr.R. 460, 160 N.Y.S. 769 (1915); Annotation, Validity and Construction of Statutes Punishing Commercial Bribery, 1 A.L.R.3d 1350 , 1357-59.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard A. Napolitano v. Hon. Daniel P. Ward, Justice of the Illinois Supreme Court
See Friedman v. Court on the Judiciary of New York, 375 U.S. 10 , 80 S.Ct. 70 , 11 L.Ed. 2d 40 (1963); Sarisohn v. Appellate Division, Second Department, Supreme Court of the State of New York, 265 F. Supp. 455 (E.D.N.Y.1967) ; Matter of Osterman, 13 N.Y.2d a (1963), cert. den.
discussed
Cited "see"
Flowers v. Zayre Corp.
(2×)
See, State of North Carolina v. Brewer (1963) 258 N.C. 533 , 129 S.E.2d 262 , 1 A.L.R.3d 1323 , app. dis. 375 U.S. 9 , 84 S.Ct. 72 , 11 L.Ed.2d 40 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Capital Resources, LLC v. Chelda, Inc.
(2×)
Chelda’s counterclaim was based upon acts falling under the first and fourth prongs of the statute: Any person who gives, offers or promises to an agent, employee or servant any gift or gratuity whatever with intent to influence his action in relation to his principal’s, employer’s or master’s business [is guilty of commercial bribery]; [A]ny person who gives or offers [an employee authorized to procure materials by purchase or contract for his employer a] commission, discount or bonus [is guilty of commercial bribery.] Id. (emphasis added); see also State v. Brewer, 258 N.C. 533, 552-…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morial v. Judiciary Commission of State of La.
See, e. g., Friedman v. Court on the Judiciary of New York, 375 U.S. 10 , 84 S.Ct. 70 , 11 L.Ed.2d 40 (1963); Johnson v. Avery, 393 U.S. 483 , 89 S.Ct. 747 , 21 L.Ed.2d 718 (1969); Napolitano v. Ward, 457 F.2d 279 (7th Cir. 1972).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BREWER ET AL.
v.
NORTH CAROLINA.
v.
NORTH CAROLINA.
291.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1963.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 22 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA.
Malcolm B. Seawell and William T. Hatch for appellants.
Thomas Wade Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Harry W. McGalliard, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.