Whaley v. United States, 376 U.S. 911 (1964). · Go Syfert
Whaley v. United States, 376 U.S. 911 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“defendant will not be allowed to . . . his case go to the jury without objection and then upon conviction take the position that the court should have granted him a mistrial upon its own motion”
82 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 28 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Lopez Polanco (ca1, 1992-10-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Lopez Polanco
1st Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
defendant will not be allowed to . . . his case go to the jury without objection and then upon conviction take the position that the court should have granted him a mistrial upon its own motion
discussed Cited "see" Elizabeth Dole v. Local 427, International Union Of Electrical, Radio And Machine Workers, Afl-Cio
3rd Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nabors v. NLRB, 323 F.2d 686, 688 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 666 , 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964) ("NLRB" does not exist for the adjudication of 'private rights,' it acts in a public capacity to give effect to the declared public policy of the Act to eliminate and prevent obstructions to interstate commerce by enlarging collective bargaining) 10 See B.
discussed Cited "see" Dole v. Local 427, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers
3rd Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nabors v. NLRB, 323 F.2d 686, 688 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 666 , 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964) ("NLRB” does not exist for the adjudication of 'private rights,' it acts in a public capacity to give effect to the declared public policy of the Act to eliminate and prevent obstructions to interstate commerce by enlarging collective bargaining). .See B.
cited Cited "see" Millsap v. Eugene Care Center, Inc.
Or. Ct. App. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nabors v. NLRB, 323 F2d 686 (5th Cir), cert den 376 US 911 (1963).
cited Cited "see" Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary, United States Department of Labor v. Square D Company
5th Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Nabors v. NLRB, 323 F.2d 686 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 666 , 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964). 7 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. American Honda Finance Corp.
Mass. · 2018 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Whaley v. United States , 324 F.2d 356 , 356-357 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 665 , 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964) (private repossessor impersonated Federal law enforcement agent); Boland v. Essex County Bank & Trust Co ., 361 F.Supp. 917 , 921 (D.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Hoffa v. Saxbe
D.D.C. · 1974 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Whaley v. United States, 324 F.2d 356, 359 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 665 , 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (defendant, convicted of impersonating FBI agent as a ruse in connection with his occupation as an automobile repossessor, placed on probation upon condition that he not again engage in repossession business) ; Stone v. United States, 153 F.2d 331, 332-333 (9th Cir. 1946) (person convicted of unlawfully taking money from railroad dining cars required not to be employed as a stewart on any railroad engaged in interstate commerce during period of probation) ; United …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whaley
v.
United States
No. 705.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 17, 1964.
376 U.S. 911
Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. May sack for the United States.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.