green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.2 score
“defendant will not be allowed to . . . his case go to the jury without objection and then upon conviction take the position that the court should have granted him a mistrial upon its own motion”
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Lopez Polanco
defendant will not be allowed to . . . his case go to the jury without objection and then upon conviction take the position that the court should have granted him a mistrial upon its own motion
discussed
Cited "see"
Elizabeth Dole v. Local 427, International Union Of Electrical, Radio And Machine Workers, Afl-Cio
See Nabors v. NLRB, 323 F.2d 686, 688 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 666 , 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964) ("NLRB" does not exist for the adjudication of 'private rights,' it acts in a public capacity to give effect to the declared public policy of the Act to eliminate and prevent obstructions to interstate commerce by enlarging collective bargaining) 10 See B.
discussed
Cited "see"
Dole v. Local 427, International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers
See Nabors v. NLRB, 323 F.2d 686, 688 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 666 , 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964) ("NLRB” does not exist for the adjudication of 'private rights,' it acts in a public capacity to give effect to the declared public policy of the Act to eliminate and prevent obstructions to interstate commerce by enlarging collective bargaining). .See B.
cited
Cited "see"
Millsap v. Eugene Care Center, Inc.
See Nabors v. NLRB, 323 F2d 686 (5th Cir), cert den 376 US 911 (1963).
cited
Cited "see"
Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary, United States Department of Labor v. Square D Company
See Nabors v. NLRB, 323 F.2d 686 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 666 , 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Williams v. American Honda Finance Corp.
See, e.g., Whaley v. United States , 324 F.2d 356 , 356-357 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 665 , 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (1964) (private repossessor impersonated Federal law enforcement agent); Boland v. Essex County Bank & Trust Co ., 361 F.Supp. 917 , 921 (D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hoffa v. Saxbe
See, e. g., Whaley v. United States, 324 F.2d 356, 359 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 911 , 84 S.Ct. 665 , 11 L.Ed.2d 609 (defendant, convicted of impersonating FBI agent as a ruse in connection with his occupation as an automobile repossessor, placed on probation upon condition that he not again engage in repossession business) ; Stone v. United States, 153 F.2d 331, 332-333 (9th Cir. 1946) (person convicted of unlawfully taking money from railroad dining cars required not to be employed as a stewart on any railroad engaged in interstate commerce during period of probation) ; United …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whaley
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 705.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 17, 1964.
Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. May sack for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.