Huerta v. United States, 376 U.S. 954 (1964). · Go Syfert
Huerta v. United States, 376 U.S. 954 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
147 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 37 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Shark Tech LLC v. Gagnon (alsd, 2024-03-14) · Strongest negative: State v. Drayton (fladistctapp, 1969-08-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" State v. Drayton (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1969 · signal: but cf. · confidence high
But cf. Peek v. United States, 9th Cir.1963, 321 F.2d 934 , 5 A.L.R.3d 802 , cert. denied, 376 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 973 , 11 L.Ed.2d 973 .
cited Cited "see" Shark Tech LLC v. Gagnon
S.D. Ala. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Strachan Shipping Co. v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche S.M., 324 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied 376 U.S. 954 , 969 (1964).
cited Cited "see" In Re TPT Transportation
M.D. La. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Strachan Shipping Co. v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maalschappy, N.V., 324 F.2d 746 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 969 , 11 L.Ed.2d 972 (1964). 51 .
cited Cited "see" Matter of Palmer Johnson Savannah, Inc.
S.D. Ga. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Strachan Shipping Co. v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche, 324 F.2d 746 (5th Cir.1963), cert. denied 376 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 969 , 11 L.Ed.2d 972 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" Fisher Stoves, Inc. v. All Nighter Stove Works, Inc.
1st Cir. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
Keebler Co. v. Rovira Biscuit Co., ante, 624 F.2d at 378 ; Intricate Metal Products, Inc. v. Schneider , ante, 324 F.2d at 562 ; see General Radio Co. v. Superior Radio Co., 3 Cir., 1963, 321 F.2d 857, 864 , cert. denied, 376 U.S. 938 , 84 S.Ct. 793 , 11 L.Ed.2d 973 ; Crescent Tool Co. v. Kilborn & Bishop Co., 2 Cir., 1917, 247 F. 299, 301 ; 3 Callman, The Law of Unfair Competition, Trademarks and Monopolies, § 77.4(e)(1) at 388 (1969).
discussed Cited "see" Dezzie Estelle Hinton Cotten v. Two 'R' Drilling Company, Inc. v. James Casing Crews, Inc.
Idaho · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Strachan Shipping Co. v. Koninklyke Nederlandsche Stoomboot Maalschappy, 324 F.2d 746 (5th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 969 , 11 L.Ed.2d 972 (1964). 4 . 358 U.S. 625 , 79 S.Ct. 406 , 3 L.Ed.2d 550 (1959). 5 . 410 F.2d 178 (5th Cir. 1969).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Ramon Figueroa-Paz (2×)
9th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Peek v. United States (9 Cir. 1963) 321 F.2d 934, 942-943 , cert. den., 376 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 973 , 11 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Donald Doughty (2×)
7th Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See Peek v. United States, 321 F.2d 934, 943 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. den. 376 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 973 , 11 L.Ed.2d 973 .
discussed Cited "see" George P. Bradley v. United States
D.C. Cir. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cantrell v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 311 , 312, 323 F.2d 613, 614 (1963), cert. denied, 376 U.S. 955 , 84 S.Ct. 973 , 11 L.Ed.2d 973 (1964); Harper v. United States, supra note 18, 99 U.S.App.D.C. at 326-327 , 239 F.2d at 947-948 ; Green v. United States, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 249 , 188 F.2d 48 , cert. denied, 341 U.S. 955 , 71 S.Ct. 1008 , 95 L.Ed. 1376 (1951); Copeland v. United States, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 308, 309 , 152 F.2d 769, 770 (1945), cert. denied, 328 U.S. 841 , 66 S.Ct. 1010 , 90 L.Ed. 1815 (1946); Fall v. United States, supra note 24, 60 App.D.C. at 130-131 , 49 F.2d at 512-513 .…
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Homer Phillips (4×)
7th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Medrano and Bible the transactions were clearly more remote in time than those involved in this case 5 Evenson v. United States, 316 F.2d 94, 95-96 (8th Cir. 1963); see also Huerta v. United States, 322 F.2d 1, 3 (9th Cir. 1963), certiorari denied, 376 U.S. 954 , 84 S.Ct. 974 , 11 L.Ed.2d 973 ; Conner v. United States, 322 F.2d 647 (5th Cir. 1963) 1 In Enriquez, the Ninth Circuit held that evidence of prior use of marihuana was inadmissible on the issue of intent in a case involving the sale of heroin. 314 F.2d at 717 2 In discussing the background of the rule in a context not relevant here…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Huerta
v.
United States
No. 815, Misc..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 23, 1964.
376 U.S. 954
Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Cited by 74 opinions  |  Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.