neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964
1995
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MARKS
v.
ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
v.
ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE.
253.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 22, 1964.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 16 opinions | Published
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.
Murray A. Gordon argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Charles Gordon argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and L. Paul Winings.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN took no part in the decision of this case.