Com. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 379 U.S. 817 (1964). · Go Syfert
Search
Com. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 379 U.S. 817 (1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“the effect of 6 is to prolong agreements subject to its provisions regardless of what they say as to termination.”
75 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. (dcd, 1988-08-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1964 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1964 1995 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Air Line Pilots Ass'n International v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.
D.D.C. · 1988 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
the effect of 6 is to prolong agreements subject to its provisions regardless of what they say as to termination.
cited Cited "see" King v. United States
D. Colo. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. State of California, 328 F.2d 729, 731 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 34 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" Barrett v. United States
2d Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. California, 328 F.2d 729, 736-38 (9th Cir.) (legislative history, as well as plain meaning of statute, supports this result), ce rt. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 34 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964); United States v. Illinois, 454 F.2d 297, 301 (7th Cir.1971) (following United States v. California), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 918 , 92 S.Ct. 1767 , 32 L.Ed.2d 117 (1972).
discussed Cited "see" Elizabeth Barrett, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Harold Blauer, Deceased v. United States of America, United States of America, Third-Party v. State of New York, Third-Party
2d Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. California, 328 F.2d 729, 736-38 (9th Cir.) (legislative history, as well as plain meaning of statute, supports this result), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 34 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964); United States v. Illinois, 454 F.2d 297, 301 (7th Cir.1971) (following United States v. California ), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 918 , 92 S.Ct. 1767 , 32 L.Ed.2d 117 (1972). 12 It is also now recognized that the federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain third-party suits for indemnity by the United States against a state, even where the main action was commenced by a private citizen. "…
discussed Cited "see" Air Line Pilots Association, International, Cross v. United Air Lines, Inc., Cross-Appellee
7th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 329 F.2d 32, 35 (2d Cir.) (noting that the status quo requirement is “to prevent rocking of the boat by either side until the procedures of the Railroad Labor Act [have been] exhausted”), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964); American Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers Union, 57 L.R.R.M.
cited Cited "see" International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 329 F.2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" Airline Pilots Association, International v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., Flight Engineers' International Association, Paa Chapter, Afl-Cio v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Air Cargo, Inc. v. Local Union 851, 733 F.2d 241 , 246 (2d Cir.1984) (making clear that actual, objective working conditions constitute the Section 6 status quo only if both parties, either expressly or by their conduct, have indicated their consent to those conditions). 22 Nor is our decision in Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 329 F.2d 32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964), to the contrary.
cited Cited "see" Air Line Pilots Ass'n, International v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
E.D.N.Y · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manning v. American Airlines, 329 F.2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964); Air Cargo, Inc., supra, at 247.
cited Cited "see" Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes v. Rea Express, Inc.
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 221 F.Supp. 301 (S.D.N.Y.1963), aff’d., 329 F.2d 32 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964).
cited Cited "see" Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes, Afl-Cio v. Rea Express, Inc., Debtor, Rea Express, Inc., Debtor-In-Possession, International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. Rea Express, Inc., Debtor, Rea Express, Inc., Debtor-In-Possession
2d Cir. · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 221 F.Supp. 301 (S.D.N.Y.1963), Aff'd., 329 F.2d 32 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964).
cited Cited "see" Ethyle Bloch v. Harold N. Bloch
3rd Cir. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
Cf. Loughran v. Loughran, 292 U.S. 216 , 223 n. 3 (1934); see Albina Engine and Machine Works v. *560 O’Leary, 328 F.2d 877 (9 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 (1964).
discussed Cited "see" Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Switchmen's Union of North America v. The Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company, Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen v. The Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company, the Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, the Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company v. Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, Bangor and Aroostook Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. The Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad Company, (Two Cases)
D.C. Cir. · 1968 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bangor & A.R.R. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen, 255 F.Supp. 476 (D.D.C.1966) 15 Compare Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 329 F.2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed.2d 29 (1964).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." National Labor Relations Board v. C & C Plywood Corporation and Veneers, Inc.
9th Cir. · 1969 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, N.L.R.B. v. Commerce Co., 5 Cir. 1964, 328 F.2d 600, 601 , cert. denied 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 32 , 13 L.Ed.2d 28 ; N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca Cola Bottling Co., 5 Cir. 1967, 382 F.2d 921, 924 ; MAR-JAC Poultry Co., Inc., 136 N.L.R.B. 785 . 6 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad
D.C. Cir. · 1967 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Manning v. American Airlines, Inc., 329 F.2d 32, 34 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 817 , 85 S.Ct. 33 , 13 L.Ed. 2d 29 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Commerce Co., doing business as Lamar Hotel
v.
National Labor Relations Board
No. 78.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
379 U.S. 817
Charles R. Vickery, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for respondent.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 58%
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.