green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Srinivasan v. Snow
See Boryan v. United States, 884 F.2d 767, 771 (4th Cir.1989) (citing United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lawrenson, 334 F.2d 464 , 465 n. 2 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 869 , 85 S. Ct. 141 , 13 L.Ed.2d 71 (1964)) (holding that the standard governing relief on the basis of newly discovered evidence under Rule 59 or Rule 60 is the same).
cited
Cited "see"
Tomar Electronics, Inc. v. Whelen Technologies, Inc.
See United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Lawrenson, 334 F.2d 464, 467 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 869 , 85 S.Ct. 141 , 13 L.Ed.2d 71 (1964); Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Coakley & Williams Construction, Incorporated v. Structural Concrete Equipment, Incorporated
See United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Lawrenson, 334 F.2d 464, 466-67 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 869 , 85 S.Ct. 141 , 13 L.Ed.2d 71 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
State of Ariz. v. Motorola, Inc.
See United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Lawrenson, 334 F.2d 464, 467 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 869 , 85 S.Ct. 141 , 13 L.Ed.2d 71 (1964); Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
State of Ariz. v. Motorola, Inc.
See United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Lawrenson, 334 F.2d 464, 467 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 869 , 85 S.Ct. 141 , 13 L.Ed.2d 71 (1964); Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Arizona v. Motorola, Inc.
See United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Lawrenson, 334 F.2d 464, 467 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 869 , 85 S.Ct. 141 , 13 L.Ed.2d 71 (1964); Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
S. Paul Hazen v. Southern Hills National Bank
See Skolnick v. Martin, 7 Cir., 317 F.2d 855, 857 , cert. denied 375 U.S. 908 , 84 S.Ct. 199 , 11 L.Ed.2d 146 , and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Lawrenson, 4 Cir., 334 F.2d 464, 466-467 , cert. denied 379 U.S. 869 , 85 S.Ct. 141 , 13 L.Ed.2d 71 . 7 Affirmed. 1 Of the Fifth Circuit, sitting by designation
discussed
Cited "see"
Hazen v. Southern Hills National Bank
See Skolnick v. Martin, 7 Cir., 317 F.2d 855, 857 , cert. denied 375 U.S. 908 , 84 S.Ct. 199 , 11 L.Ed.2d 146 , and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Lawrenson, 4 Cir., 334 F.2d 464, 466-467 , cert. denied 379 U.S. 869 , 85 S.Ct. 141 , 13 L.Ed.2d 71 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Griffiths
See, e.g., Fabian v. State, 235 Md. 306 , 201 A.2d 511 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 869 , 85 S.Ct. 135 , 13 L.Ed.2d 72 (1964) (defendant was found guilty on three counts, but the trial judge imposed sentence on only one count, leaving two counts unresolved; this Court entertained the appeal from the judgment on one count and, with respect to the other two counts, held that the failure to sentence would be deemed a suspension of sentence); Felkner v. State, 218 Md. 300, 306 , 146 A.2d 424, 428 (1958) (a nonjury trial where the trial judge found the defendant guilty on one count, not guilty on anoth…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Garrick v. Kelly
See also United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lawrenson, 334 F.2d 464, 465 (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 379 U.S. 869 , 85 S.Ct. 141 , 13 L.Ed.2d 71 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anderson v. State
See also Fabian v. State, 235 Md. 306, 318-219 , 201 A.2d 511 , cert. denied, 379 U.S. 869 , 85 S.Ct. 135 , 13 L.Ed.2d 72 (1964); Moore v. State, 15 Md.App. 396, 404-405 , 291 A.2d 73 , cert. denied, 266 Md. 740 (1972). *447 The use of immoderate force is the thing that defeats the parental privilege, even where otherwise applicable.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lawrenson
v.
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
v.
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
No. 330.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1964.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.