green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc v. General Electric Company
See International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers v. General Electric Co., 332 F.2d 485, 488 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 379 U.S. 928 , 85 S.Ct. 324 , 13 L.Ed.2d 341 (1964).
cited
Cited "see"
Local 719, American Bakery and Confectionery Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. The National Biscuit Company, a Corporation
See Internationa) Union of Electrical, Radio, and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO v. General Electric Co., 332 F.2d 485, 490 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 928 , 85 S.Ct. 324 , 13 L.Ed.2d 341 (1964). 14 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warehousemen's Health & Welfare Fund v. IT Corp.
See, e. g., International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO v. General Electric Co., 332 F.2d 485 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 928 , 85 S.Ct. 324 , 13 L.Ed.2d 341 (1964); NLRB v. Gulf Atl.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Local 783, Allied Industrial Workers of America, Aflcio v. General Electric Company
See also International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO v. General Electric Co., 332 F.2d 485 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 928 , 85 S.Ct. 324 , 13 L.Ed.2d 341 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Local Union 866
Compare International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. General Electric Co., 332 F.2d 485 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 928 , 85 S.Ct. 324 , 13 L.Ed.2d 341 (1964); Local 12298, District 50, United Mine Workers v. Bridgeport Gas Co., 328 F.2d 381 (2d Cir. 1964); International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 228 F.Supp. 922 (S.D.N.Y.1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Estes
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 256.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 7, 1964.
Hume Cofer and John D. Cofer for petitioner. Wag-goner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Howard M. Fender, Gilbert J. Pena and Alio B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Published
Petition for writ of certio-rari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas granted limited to Question 2 presented by the petition which reads as follows:
“Whether the action of the trial court, over petitioner’s continued objection, denied him due process of law and equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, in requiring petitioner to submit to live television of his trial, and in refusing to adopt in this all out publicity case, as a rule of trial procedure, Canon 35 of the Canons of Judicial Ethics of the American Bar Association, and •instead adopting and following, over defendant’s objection, Canon 28 of the Canons of Judicial Ethics, since approved by the Judicial Section of the integrated (State agency) State Bar of Texas.”