green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Security Finance Group, Inc. v. Provident Bank of Kentucky
See Smartt v. Coca-Cola Bottling Corp., 337 F.2d 950, 951 (6th Cir.1964) (per curiam), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 934 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
Farmers Home Administration v. Rape (In Re Rape)
See Chase Capital Corp. v. Bumb, 336 F.2d 1000, 1001 (9th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 941 , 13 L.Ed.2d 821 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Christian & Porter Aluminum Co.
See Chase Capital Corporation v. Bumb, 336 F.2d 1000 (9th Cir. 1964), cert, den., 380 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 941 , 13 L.Ed.2d 831 (1965), reh. den., 380 U.S. 989 , 85 S.Ct. 1329 , 14 L.Ed.2d 283 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
See also Pan American-Grace Airways, Inc. v. CAB, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 326 , 342 F.2d 905, 909-10 (1964) (Wright, J., concurring), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 941 , 13 L.Ed.2d 821 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Braniff Airways, Inc., a Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, , American Airlines, Inc., Intervenor. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., United States of America, Delta Air Lines, Inc., City of Kansas City, Missouri and Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City, Intervenors. Allegheny Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc. And Delta Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, American Airlines, Inc., Delta Air Lines, Inc. And City of Kansas City, Missouri, Intervenors. Ozark Air Lines, Inc., a Corporation v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Delta Air Lines, Inc. And American Airlines, Inc., Intervenors
See also Pan American-Grace Airways, Inc. v. CAB, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 326 , 342 F.2d 905, 909-10 (1964) (Wright, J., concurring), Cert. denied, 380 U.S. 934 , 85 S.Ct. 941 , 13 L.Ed.2d 821 (1965). 18 Since, in the instant appeal, petitioners do not advance any challenge to the Board's authority, but rather present a typically detailed challenge to the merits of the Board's decision, judicial review of the order granting international air route authority, approved by the President, appears to be expressly precluded by the Waterman holding.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Grossman
v.
Stubbs
v.
Stubbs
No. 822.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 1965.
Published
Sup. Ct. N. J. Certiorari denied.