green
Positive treatment
4.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Barker v. Wingo
(2×)
See n. 18, supra. [30] See, e. g., United States v. Simmons, 338 F. 2d 804, 807 (CA2 1964), cert. denied, 380 U. S. 983 (1965); Note, The Right to a Speedy Trial, 20 Stan.
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,954 United States of America v. Vincent Alo
See United States v. Simmons, 338 F.2d 804, 807 (2d Cir. 1904), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 983 , 85 S.Ct. 1352 , 14 L.Ed.2d 276 (1965). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stone
Von Cseh v. Fay, 313 F.2d 620, 623 (2d Cir. 1963); accord, United States v. Simmons, 338 F.2d 804, 807 (2d Cir. 1964), cert.denied, 380 U.S. 983 , 85 S.Ct. 1352 , 14 L.Ed.2d 276 (1965); United States v. Mann, 291 F.Supp. 268, 270 (S.D.N.Y.1968).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Navarre
See United States v. Simmons, 338 F.2d 804 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. den. 380 U.S. 983 , 85 S.Ct. 1352 , 14 L.Ed.2d 276 (1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Barker v. Municipal Court of the Salinas Judicial District of Monterey County
If there was any good cause it was for the prosecution to show it.” (Harris v. Municipal Court, supra, 209 Cal. 55, 64 ; see also In re Begerow, supra, 133 Cal. 349, 354 .) “The cases hold that prejudice is presumed, or necessarily follows, from long delay; a fortiori it follows when the defendant is imprisoned *813 over the years before trial.” (Petition of Provoo (D.Md. 1955) 17 F.R.D. 183, 203 , affd. 350 U.S. 857 [ 76 S.Ct. 101 , 100 L.Ed. 761 ]; see United States v. Simmons (2d Cir. 1964) 338 F.2d 804, 808 , cert. den., 380 U.S. 983 [ 85 S.Ct. 1352 , 14 L.Ed.2d 276 ]; United States …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Delman
See United States v. Simmons, 338 F.2d 804, 807 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 983 , 85 S.Ct. 1352 , 14 L.Ed.2d 276 (1965), where the Court of Appeals noted: “‘[f]our factors are relevant to a consideration of whether denial of a speedy trial assumes due process [or Sixth Amendment] proportions: the length of delay, the reason for the delay, the prejudice to defendant, and waiver by the defendant. * * * ’ United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Thomas
See, e.g., United States v. Simmons, 338 F.2d 804, 807 (C.A.2 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 983 , 85 S.Ct. 1352 , 14 L.Ed.2d 276 (1965). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Moore v. De Young
See e. g., United States v. Simmons, 338 F.2d 804, 807 (CA 2 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 983 , [ 85 S.Ct. 1352 , 14 L.Ed.2d 276 ] (1965) ; Note, The Right to a Speedy Trial, 20 Stan.L.Rev. 476, 478 n. 15 (1968). 31 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Arthur Tortorello
See also United States v. Simmons, 338 F.2d 804 (2d Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 983 , 85 S.Ct. 1352 , 14 L.Ed.2d 276 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marvin Feinberg
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Simmons, 338 F.2d 804 (2 Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 380 U.S. 983 , 85 S.Ct. 1352 , 14 L.Ed.2d 276 (1965) 3 Though there may be a presumption of prejudice where there has been shown to have been an excessive post-arrest delay.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Simmons, aka Harold
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 836.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 26, 1965.
Norman Zolot for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.