green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bass
See Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202, 221-222 , 85 S.Ct. 824, 836-837 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965), reh. den. 381 U.S. 921 , 85 S.Ct. 1528 , 14 L.Ed.2d 442 (1965): “The presumption in any particular case must be that the prosecutor is using the State’s challenges to obtain a fair and impartial jury to try the case before the court.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry Bessesen
See, United States v. Allegretti, 340 F.2d 254 (7th Cir. 1964) (en banc), reversing in part, United States v. Allegretti, 340 F.2d 243 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 911 , 85 S.Ct. 1531 , 14 L.Ed.2d 433 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America Ex Rel. Horace Laws v. Howard D. Yeager, Principal Keeper of the New Jersey State Prison at Trenton, New Jersey
See Swain v. Alabama, 380 U.S. 202 , 85 S.Ct. 824 , 13 L.Ed.2d 759 (1965), rehearing denied, 381 U.S. 921 , 85 S.Ct. 1528 , 14 L.Ed.2d 442 (1965).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. J. W. Johnson, Adolphus Foston and Harry Johnson
See United States v. Allegretti, 340 F.2d 254, 256 (rehearing en banc), (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 911 , 85 S.Ct. 1531 , 14 L.Ed.2d 433 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ramseyer v. General Motors Corporation
See, United States v. Allegretti, 340 F.2d 254 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 911 , 85 S.Ct. 1531 , 14 L.Ed.2d 433 (1965); cf., United States v. Mucherino, 311 F.2d 172 (4th Cir. 1962). 16 As we read the pertinent part of the record reproduced below, 2 plaintiff conceded that testimony relating to hospitalization might bear on 'credibility' and pressed his objection only to the question calling for the cause of hospitalization.
cited
Cited "see"
Ramseyer v. General Motors Corp.
See, United States v. Allegretti, 340 F.2d 254 (7th Cir. 1964), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 911 , 85 S.Ct. 1531 , 14 L.Ed.2d 433 (1965); cf., United States v. Mucherino, 311 F.2d 172 (4th Cir. 1962).
discussed
Cited "see"
LEVEQUE
It is well settled that where an application for discretionary relief has been made, and there is a change in the law after the application is filed, but before it has been granted, the new law is controlling, even if it results in a loss of eligibility by the applicant; see Patais v. immigration and NaturaZiea- 036 Interim Decision #1840 Von Service, 337 F. 2d 733 (8th Cir., 1964), cert. den. 360 U.S. 952 (1965), reh. den. 381 U.S. 921 (1965) ; Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 332 F. 2d 424 (2d.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Murzyn, A/K/A \Mo Mo\"
See, e. g., United States v. Allegretti, 340 F.2d 254, 256 (7th Cir. 1964) (in banc) (adopting the reasoning of United States v. Allegretti, 340 F.2d 243, 248-53 (7th Cir. 1964) (Enoch, J., dissenting)), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 911 , 85 S.Ct. 1531 , 14 L.Ed.2d 433 (1965).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thomas et ux.
v.
United States Romano v. United States Patsis, aka Nickas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Casida v. International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO James v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent Graves v. Texas
v.
United States Romano v. United States Patsis, aka Nickas v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Casida v. International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO James v. Anderson, Jail Superintendent Graves v. Texas
No. 113; No. 193; No. 865; No. 897; No. 886; No. 893.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1965.
Published
Opinion text not yet available. Try Google Scholar