Avgikos v. Louisiana, 381 U.S. 924 (1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Avgikos v. Louisiana, 381 U.S. 924 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Eugene Pepper v. Phillip N. Miani and Maduff & Sons, Inc., a Colorado Corporation (ca10, 1984-05-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Eugene Pepper v. Phillip N. Miani and Maduff & Sons, Inc., a Colorado Corporation
10th Cir. · 1984 · signal: accord · confidence high
Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Red Ball Motor Freight Co., 376 F.2d 40 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 829 , 88 S.Ct. 92 , 19 L.Ed.2d 87 (1967); accord, Allied Air Freight, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 340 F.2d 160 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 381 U.S. 924 , 85 S.Ct. 1560 , 14 L.Ed.2d 683 (1965); Chronicle Publishing Co. v. National Broadcasting Co., 294 F.2d 744, 746 (9th Cir.1961); Day v. Pennsylvania Railroad, 243 F.2d 485 (3d Cir.1957).
discussed Cited "see" Investment Properties International, Ltd. v. Ios, Ltd.
2d Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
Bonsal, for an order vacating plaintiffs-petitioners' notice of taking. 2 Judge Bonsal granted the motion "without prejudice to further discovery if it is determined that this Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action." 4 The writ of mandamus 3 is in general "'reserved for really extraordinary causes,"' Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 376 U.S. 240, 245 , 84 S.Ct. 769 , 11 L.Ed.2d 674 (1964), quoting Ex parte Fahey, 332 U.S. 258, 260 , 67 S.Ct. 1558 , 91 L.Ed. 2041 (1947), and is employed only "to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercise of its prescribed …
discussed Cited "see" Investment Properties International, Ltd. v. IOS, Ltd.
2d Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
Bonsai, for. an order vacating plaintiffs-pe titioners’ notice of taking. 2 Judge Bonsai granted the motion “without prejudice to further discovery if it is determined that this Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action.” The writ of mandamus 3 is in general “ ‘reserved for really extraordinary causes,’ ” Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., 376 U.S. 240, 245 , 84 S. Ct. 769 , 11 L.Ed.2d 674 (1964), quoting Ex parte Fahey, 332 U.S. 258, 260 , 67 S. Ct. 1558 , 91 L.Ed. 2041 (1947), and is employed only “to confine an inferior court to a lawful exercis…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Avgikos
v.
Louisiana
No. 832.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 1965.
381 U.S. 924
Chester E. Wallace for petitioner. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, and M. E. Culligan and Harry J. Kron, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Published

Sup. Ct. La. Cer-tiorari denied.