green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1965 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1965
1995
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Feathers v. Chevron
See Jones v. McFaddin, 382 S.W.2d 277, 278 (Tex.Civ.App.--Texarkana 1964, writ dism'd w.o.j.), appeal dism'd, 382 U.S. 15 , 86 S.Ct. 56 , 15 L.Ed.2d 11 (1965). 4 The decades of Texas state-court litigation over ownership of the oil field ended in 1964, when a Texas appellate court held that the heirs and assigns of W.P.H.
cited
Cited "see"
Feathers v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
See Jones v. McFaddin, 382 S.W.2d 277, 278 (Tex.Civ.App.—Texarkana 1964, writ dism’d w.o.j.), appeal dism’d, 382 U.S. 15 , 86 S.Ct. 56 , 15 L.Ed.2d 11 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kapral v. Jepson
See also Bianchi v. Griffing, 238 F.Supp. 997 [(E.D.N.Y.1965), appeal dismissed, 382 U.S. 15 (1965)].” This Court accordingly holds that the admitted disproportion in population between the five voting districts in the City of Milford on the basis of which aldermen are elected to the legislative body of that City presents a justiciable controversy over which this Court has jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Montgomery County Council v. Garrott
See, e.g., Bianchi v. Griffing, 238 F. Supp. 997, 1002 (E.D.N.Y. 1965), and cases cited, appeal dismissed, Griffing v. Bianchi, 382 U.S. 15 , 15 L.Ed.2d 11 ; Ellis v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 234 F. Supp. 945 (D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brouwer v. Kent County Clerk
See, also, Bianchi v. Griffing (1965), 238 F Supp 997 , appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction, 382 US 15 ( 86 S Ct 52 , 15 L ed 2d *638 11); Goldstein v. Rockefeller (1965), 45 Misc 2d 778 ( 257 NYS2d 994 ); and Ellis v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore (CA 4, 1965), 352 F2d 123.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
GRIFFING ET AL., CONSTITUTING BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK
v.
BIANCHI ET AL.
v.
BIANCHI ET AL.
206.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1965.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.
Stanley S. Corwin, Joseph L. Nellis and Allen A. Sperling for appellants.
Richard C. Cahn for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.