green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.6 score
“it is also the rule that where is asserted, the earlier determination must 1376 have been of a question of fact essential to the earlier judgment.”
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 16 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Indiana Michigan Power Co. v. United States
it is also the rule that where is asserted, the earlier determination must have been of a question of fact essential to the earlier judgment.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United States
it is also the rule that where is asserted, the earlier determination must 1376 have been of a question of fact essential to the earlier judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Raiford v. Buslease, Inc.
See McDaniel v. United States, 343 F.2d 785, 786-87 (5th Cir.) (violation of section 5(a) in mailing of confirmation of sale) cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 59 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1965); United States v. Pollack, 534 F.2d 964 , 972 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.) (use of mails to transmit proceeds or confirmation of sale of unregistered securities violates section 5(a)(1)), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976); United States v. Wolfson, 405 F.2d 779, 783-84 (2d Cir.1968), (section 5(a)(1) violated when mails used to remit proceeds of sale of unregistered securities to seller),…
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernice Barbour Raiford v. Buslease, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Thomas F. Morris, Morgan B. Raiford v. Buslease, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., and Thomas F. Morris
See McDaniel v. United States, 343 F.2d 785, 786-87 (5th Cir.) (violation of section 5(a) in mailing of confirmation of sale) cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 59 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1965); United States v. Pollack, 534 F.2d 964 , 972 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.) (use of mails to transmit proceeds or confirmation of sale of unregistered securities violates section 5(a)(1)), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 924 , 97 S.Ct. 324 , 50 L.Ed.2d 292 (1976); United States v. Wolfson, 405 F.2d 779, 783-84 (2d Cir.1968), (section 5(a)(1) violated when mails used to remit proceeds of sale of unregistered securities to seller),…
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Minkin
See McDaniel v. United States, 343 F.2d 785, 789 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 382 U.S. 826 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vietor
See McDaniel v. United States, 343 F.2d 785, 789 (5th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 59 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1965); Kay v. United States, 255 F.2d 476, 480-81 (4th Cir. 1958); United States v. Leathers, 135 F.2d 507, 511 (2nd Cir. 1943); see also Otney v. United States, 340 F.2d 696, 699-700 (10th Cir. 1965).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cecil Dwayne Evans, Arnold Gene Tate, and Charles Edward Gent, Jr.
See McDaniel v. United States, 343 F.2d 785, 788-89 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 59 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1965); New Amsterdam Gas Co. v. W.D.
cited
Cited "see"
Corrected Opinion United States of America v. Lewis Miller Smyth, III and Glenn B. Bavousett
See McDaniel v. United States, 343 F.2d 785, 789 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 59 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1965); Azcona v. United States, 257 F.2d 462 (5th Cir. 1958).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Claude John Scallion, Raymond Lynn Buckelew, James Laney Jenkins and Judsonlee Drane
(2×)
However, the Congress has the power to prescribe what evidence is to be received in the federal courts, as long as it does not, at the same time, prescribe that such evidence shall conclusively prove “the existence of the ultimate fact on which guilt is predicated.” Tot v. United States, 319 U.S. 463, 467 , 63 S.Ct. 1241, 1245 , 87 L.Ed. 1519, 1524 (1943); Luria v. United States, 231 U.S. 9, 25 , 34 S.Ct. 10, 14 , 58 L.Ed. 101, 106 (1913); Bailey v. Alabama, 219 U.S. 219, 238 , 31 S.Ct. 145, 150 , 55 L.Ed. 191, 200 (1911); see McDaniel v. United States, 343 F.2d 785 (5th Cir.), cert. denie…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Horton
See United States v. McGuire, 347 F.2d 99 (6th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 59 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1966); McKenna v. United States, 232 F.2d 431, 436-37 (8th Cir. 1956); United States v. Nunan, 236 F.2d 576, 588 (2d Cir. 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 912 , 77 S.Ct. 661 , 1 L.Ed.2d 665 (1957).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard A. Clark v. H. R. Watchie
See Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists Local # 1304, 344 F.2d 300, 306 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 61 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1965), wherein we said that “where estoppel by judgment is asserted, the earlier determination must have been of a question of fact essential to the earlier judgment.” Not only were the factual settings in the two suits different, but different legal standards are to be applied to assess liability in each suit.
discussed
Cited "see"
Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. John W. Gardner, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, and James L. Goddard, Commissioner of Food and Drugs
See McDaniel v. United States, 343 F.2d 785, 789 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 59 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1965); In Re Shelley Furniture, Inc., 283 F.2d 540, 543 (7th Cir. 1960). *1096 However, other evidence supports the finding that there has been a significant diversion of meprobamate from legitimate channels.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
County of Erie v. Abbott-Ridge Roads
Damages resulting merely from circuity of access are noncompensable (Selig v State of New York, 10 NY2d 34, 39 ; see also, Northern Lights Shopping Center v State of New York, 20 AD2d 415, 419 , affd 15 NY2d 688 , cert denied 382 US 826 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Painters District Council No. 38, Brotherhood of Painters, Decorators and Paperhangers of America, Afl-Cio v. Edgewood Contracting Company
See also Fibreboard Paper Products Corp. v. East Bay Union of Machinists, 344 F.2d 300 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 61 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1965). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate Of William Kahr
E.g., United States v. Siano, 356 F.2d 927 (2 Cir. 1966); Estate of Geiger v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 352 F.2d 221, 227 (8 Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 1012 , 86 S.Ct. 620 , 15 L.Ed.2d 527 (1966) 5 See also Estate of Geiger v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, supra at 223, n. 1; cf. United States v. Siano, supra; compare United States v. McGuire, 347 F.2d 99 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 59 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1965); United States v. Jannsen, 339 F.2d 916, 917 (7 Cir. 1964)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kahr v. Commissioner
See also Estate of Geiger v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, supra at 223, n. 1; cf. United States v. Siano, supra; compare United States v. McGuire, 347 F.2d 99 (6 Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 826 , 86 S.Ct. 59 , 15 L.Ed.2d 71 (1965); United States v. Jannsen, 339 F.2d 916, 917 (7 Cir. 1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Avallone
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 237.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 11, 1965.
Nicholas J. Capuano for petitioner., Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.