Murphy v. Larkin, 382 U.S. 903 (1965). · Go Syfert
Search
Murphy v. Larkin, 382 U.S. 903 (1965). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
108 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 42 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Westerman v. State (ark, 2015-02-26) · Strongest negative: Lindy Pen Co., Inc. v. Bic Pen Corp. (cacd, 1982-10-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Lindy Pen Co., Inc. v. Bic Pen Corp.
C.D. Cal. · 1982 · signal: but see · confidence high
Assuming that § 15 may be used as a “sword,” see Union Carbide Corp. v. Ever-Ready Inc., 531 F.2d 366, 371-377 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 830 , 97 S.Ct. 91 , 50 L.Ed.2d 94 (1976); but see Tillamook County Creamery Ass’n v. Tillamook Cheese and Dairy Ass’n, 345 F.2d 158, 163 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 903 , 86 S.Ct. 239 , 15 L.Ed.2d 157 (1965), I find that defendant uses the term “Auditor’s” “otherwise than as a trade or service mark” and that the term “is descriptive of and used fairly and in good faith only to describe ... its pens.” 15 U.S.C. § 1115 (b…
discussed Cited "see" Westerman v. State
Ark. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ridgeway v. State, 239 Ark. 377 , 389 S.W.2d 617 , cert. denied, 382 U.S. 902 , 86 S.Ct. 236 , 15 L.Ed.2d 156 (1965) (stating that the sending of the petitioner to the state hospital and the examination of him by hospital officials, which was reported to the circuit court, showed that any possible claim of the petitioner’s sanity was before the circuit court and could not later be considered on a petition for writ of error coram nobis).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harrell
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Borough of Ford City v. United States, 345 F.2d 645, 648 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 902 , 86 S.Ct. 236 , 15 L.Ed.2d 156 (1965). 26 The district court found that the Tombig-bee floods and their duration and extent “are unpredictable except that they generally occur, if they do at all, during the winter, or wet months, December through March.” 27 These floods may last as briefly as a few days before receding and returning to within the banks and bed of the Tombigbee.
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Harrell
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Borough of Ford City v. United States, 345 F.2d 645, 648 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 902 , 86 S.Ct. 236 , 15 L.Ed.2d 156 (1965). 26 29 The district court found that the Tombigbee floods and their duration and extent "are unpredictable except that they generally occur, if they do at all, during the winter, or wet months, December through March." 27 These floods may last as briefly as a few days before receding and returning to within the banks and bed of the Tombigbee.
discussed Cited "see" Lindy Pen Company, Inc., and Blackfeet Plastics, Inc. v. Bic Pen Corporation
9th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
Prudential Insurance Co. v. Gibraltar Financial Corp., 694 F.2d 1150, 1153 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 103 S.Ct. 3538 , 77 L.Ed.2d 1389 (1983); see Tillamook County Creamery Association v. Tillamook Cheese and Dairy Association, 345 F.2d 158, 163 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 903 , 86 S.Ct. 239 , 15 L.Ed.2d 157 (1965).
discussed Cited "see" Buttrey v. United States
E.D. La. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See Borough of Ford City v. United States, 345 F.2d 645, 648 (3rd Cir.1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 902 , 86 S.Ct. 236 , 15 L.Ed.2d 156 . *298 One can find in the reports numerous other definitions of the term, most varying in some way from the others and designed to provide a working definition for the facts in the particular case.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Cameron
M.D. Fla. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Borough of Ford City v. United States, 345 F.2d 645, 648 (3rd Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 902 , 86 S.Ct. 236 , 15 L.Ed.2d 156 .
discussed Cited "see" State, Department of Natural Resources v. Pankratz (2×)
Alaska · 1975 · signal: see · confidence high
See Borough of Ford City v. United States, 345 F.2d 645, 648 (3rd Cir. 1965), cert, denied, 382 U.S. 902 , 86 S.Ct. 236 , 15 L.Ed.2d 156 (1965). .
cited Cited "see" James D. Booker v. State of Arkansas
8th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ridgeway v. State, 239 Ark. 377 , 389 S.W.2d 617, 619-620 (1965), cert. denied 382 U.S. 902 , 86 S.Ct. 236 , 15 L.Ed.2d 156 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Application of JW Schonfeld, Ltd.
E.D. Va. · 1978 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Zamaroni v. Philpott, 346 F.2d 365 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 903 , 86 S.Ct. 238 , 15 L.Ed.2d 157 (1965); Hamilton v. United States, 309 F.Supp. 468 (S.D.N.Y.1969), aff’d per curiam, 429 F.2d 427 (2d Cir. 1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 913 , 91 S.Ct. 881 , 27 L.Ed.2d 812 (1971).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Murphy
v.
Larkin, Corporation Counsel, City of New York
No. 456.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 8, 1965.
382 U.S. 903
Francis X. Tucker, Spencer Pinkham and Vernon Murphy, pro se, for petitioner., Leo A. Larkin, pro se, and for other respondents.
Cited by 40 opinions  |  Published

Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.