green
Positive treatment
1.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Drew
See Goodwin v. United States, 1965, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 9 , 347 F.2d 793 , cert. denied, 1965, 382 U.S. 920 , 86 S.Ct. 298 , 15 L.Ed.2d 234 ; Marshall v. United States, 5 Cir. 1970, 422 F.2d 185 ; Davis v. United States, 5 Cir. 1970, 423 F.2d 974 , cert. denied, 400 U.S. 836 ; Ker v. California, 1963, 374 U.S. 23 , 83 S.Ct. 1623 , 10 L.Ed.2d 726 ; Harris v. United States, supra. Drew does not allege, and there is nothing in the record to indicate, that the officers had firearms rather than driving lights on their minds when they stopped Drew’s automobile.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Goodwin
v.
United States Vaughn v. United States and Williams v. United States
v.
United States Vaughn v. United States and Williams v. United States
No. 483; No. 484; No. 603.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 15, 1965.
Petitioners pro se., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 121 U. S. App. D. C. 9, 347 F. 2d 793.