United States v. Grinnell Corp., 383 U.S. 933 (1966). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Grinnell Corp., 383 U.S. 933 (1966). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1984 · …but infringement cannot be avoided by the mere fact that the accused device is more or less efficient or performs additional functions. ⚠ not in text
74 citation events across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Goodwall Construction Co. v. Beers Construction Co. (gand, 1992-04-02)
Treatment trajectory · 1966 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1966 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Goodwall Construction Co. v. Beers Construction Co.
N.D. Ga. · 1992 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
infringement cannot be avoided by the mere fact that the accused device is more or less efficient
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Texas Instruments, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission
Fed. Cir. · 1986 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
infringement cannot be avoided by the mere fact that the accused device is more or less efficient or performs additional functions
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Amstar Corporation v. Envirotech Corporation and Energy Fuels Nuclear, Inc. (2×)
Fed. Cir. · 1984 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
but infringement cannot be avoided by the mere fact that the accused device is more or less efficient or performs additional functions.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Marvin Glass & Associates v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
S.D. Tex. · 1970 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
clear, cogent, and satisfactory proof to remove all reasonable doubt
cited Cited "see" Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman Gunther
Fed. Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc., 343 F.2d 381, 410 , 145 USPQ 6, 29 (10th Cir.1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 933 , 86 S.Ct. 1061 , 15 L.Ed.2d 851 (1966).
cited Cited "see" Black v. Keystone Steel Fabrication
10th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc., 343 F.2d 381, 388 (10th Cir. 1965), Cert. denied, 383 U.S. 933 , 86 S.Ct. 1061 , 15 L.Ed.2d 851 , 385 U.S. 990 , 87 S.Ct. 601 , 17 L.Ed.2d 451 (1966).
cited Cited "see" Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. Keystone Steel Fabrication, Inc.
10th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc., 343 F.2d 381, 388 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 933 , 86 S.Ct. 1061 , 15 L.Ed.2d 851 , 385 U.S. 990 , 87 S.Ct. 601 , 17 L.Ed.2d 451 (1966).
cited Cited "see" Raymond C. Price and Control Sciences, Inc. v. Lake Sales Supply R.M., Inc.
10th Cir. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc., 343 F.2d 381 (10th Cir. 1965) cert. denied, 383 U.S. 933 , 86 S.Ct. 1061 , 15 L.Ed.2d 851 (1965); Bewal, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining and Mfg.
discussed Cited "see" Congoleum Industries, Inc. v. Armstrong Cork Company
E.D. Pa. · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See, McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc., 343 F.2d 381 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 933 , 86 S.Ct. 1061 , 15 L.Ed.2d 851 (1966); United States v. Krasnov, 143 F.Supp. 184 (E.D.Pa.1956); aff’d per curiam 355 U.S. 5 , 78 S.Ct. 34 , 2 L.Ed.2d 21 (1957). 24 .
discussed Cited "see" Monsanto Company v. Rohm & Haas Company (2×)
3rd Cir. · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See too McCullough Tool Company v. Well Surveys, Inc, 343 F.2d 381 , 394 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. den. 383 U.S. 933 , 86 S.Ct. 1061 , 15 L.Ed.2d 851 (1966), rehearing den. 384 U.S. 947 , 86 S.Ct. 1452 , 16 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966); Armour & Co. v. Wilson & Co, Inc, 274 F.2d 143, 148 (7th Cir. 1960); Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corporation v. Tatnall Measuring Systems Company, 169 F.Supp. 1, 25 (E.D.Pa. 1958), aff’d on other grounds, 268 F. 2d 395 (3rd Cir. 1959), cert. den. 361 U.S. 984 , 80 S.Ct. 190 , 4 L.Ed.2d 151 .
cited Cited "see" Cummins Engine Company v. General Motors Corporation
D. Maryland · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Survey, Inc., 343 F.2d 381 , 395 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 933 , 86 S.Ct. 1061 , 15 L.Ed.2d 851 (1966).
discussed Cited "see" Hensley Equipment Company, Inc. v. Esco Corporation
5th Cir. · 1967 · signal: see · confidence high
See McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc., 343 F.2d 381, 407-408 (10th Cir., 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 933 , 86 S.Ct. 1061 , 15 L.Ed.2d 751 (1966); Turbo Machine Co. v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., 241 F.Supp. 723, 729 (E.D.Pa., 1965), aff’d, 362 F.2d 5 (3rd Cir., 1966). 19 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Continental Oil Company, Cross-Appellee v. Jimmy R. Cole, D/B/A Jim R. Cole & Associates and Cole Development Co. Inc., Cross-Appellants
5th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., McCullough Tool Company v. Well Surveys, Inc., 343 F.2d 381 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 933 , 86 S.Ct. 1061 , 15 L.Ed.2d 851 (1966); Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Continental Can Company, 273 F.Supp. 94 (N.D.Ill.1967), aff’d, 397 F.2d 517 (7th Cir. 1968).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Charles S. White and American Metal Products Company v. The Fafnir Bearing Company
2d Cir. · 1968 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also McCullough Tool Co. v. Well Surveys, Inc., 343 F.2d 381, 389 (10 Cir.), cert. denied 383 U.S. 933 , 86 S.Ct. 1061 , 15 L.Ed.2d 851 (1966).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Grinnell Corp. Grinnell Corp. v. United States American District Telegraph Co. v. United States Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. United States and Automatic Fire Alarm Co. of Delaware v. United States
No. 73. No. 74. No. 75. No. 76. No. 77.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 7, 1966.
383 U.S. 933
Denis G. Mclnemey for Grinnell Corp., Macdonald Flinn for American District Telegraph Co., Bud G. Holman for Holmes Electric Protective Co., and J. Francis Hayden for Automatic Fire Alarm Co. of Delaware, on the motion.
Published
4 passages pin-cited by 4 cases
Pinpoint authority: #32,466 of 633,719
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (3) · N.D. Georgia (1) · S.D. Texas (1)

Appeals from D. C. R. I. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 381 U. S. 910.) Motion for additional time for oral argument and for leave to have more than two attorneys participate in oral argument granted. One and one-half hours allotted to each side and four attorneys permitted to participate in oral argument for appellants.