Mitsubishi Int'l Corp. v. Andersen, 386 U.S. 933 (1967). · Go Syfert
Search
Mitsubishi Int'l Corp. v. Andersen, 386 U.S. 933 (1967). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · "Privity and knowledge are deemed to exist where the owner had the means of knowledge or, as otherwise stated, where knowledge would have been obtained from reasonable inspection."
54 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 23 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: William Joyce v. Mary Ann Joyce (ca7, 1992-09-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967 1996 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) William Joyce v. Mary Ann Joyce
7th Cir. · 1992 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
privity and knowledge are deemed to exist where the owner had the means of knowledge or, as otherwise stated, where knowledge would have been obtained from reasonable inspection.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mitsubishi International Corp.
v.
A. O. Andersen & Co. China Union Lines, Ltd. v. A. O. Andersen & Co. and Lan Jing-Chau v. A. O. Andersen & Co.
No. 927; No. 933; No. 934.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 20, 1967.
386 U.S. 933
Sweeney J. Doehnng for Mitsubishi International Corp. et al., petitioners in No. 927 and respondents in No. 933. Robert Eikel for petitioner in No. 933. Newton B. Schwartz for petitioners in No. 934. Bryan F. Williams, Jr., and Carl O. Bue, Jr., for respondent A. 0. Andersen & Co. in all three cases. Leonard J. Matteson for respondent American Cyanamid Co. in Nos. 933 and 934. John V. Wheat for respondent Duncan in No. 933.
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 62%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.