green
Positive treatment
3.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Caribou School Department v. Caribou Teachers Ass'n
See Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 235 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938). “[T]he purpose of Board remedies is to rectify the harm done the injured workers, not to provide punitive measures against errant employers.” Local 57, International Ladies Garment Workers v. NLRB, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 81 , 89, 374 F.2d 295 , 303, cert. denied 387 U.S. 942 , 87 S.Ct. 2074 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1328 (1967).
cited
Cited "see"
Gilbert v. Korvette's, Inc.
See Domany v. Otis Elevator Co., 369 F. 2d 604 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 942 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jose Domingo Colmenares Vivas v. Sun Alliance Insurance Company
(2×)
See, e.g., Domany v. Otis Elevator Co., 369 F.2d 604, 614 (6th Cir.1966) (applying Ohio law), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 942 , 87 S.Ct. 2073 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1327 (1967); May Dep't Stores Co. v. Bell, 61 F.2d 830, 834-35 (8th Cir.1932) (relying on Pennsylvania and Ohio law).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Overseas Motors, Inc. v. Import Motors Limited, Inc.
See, e. g., Domany v. Otis Elevator Co., 369 F.2d 604, 608 (6th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 942 , 87 S.Ct. 2073 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1327 . 88 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rastrom v. Robbins
See also Mosley v. Dutton, 367 F.2d 913 (5th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 387 U.S. 942 , 87 S.Ct. 2074 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1328 (1967); Pedicord v. Swenson, 304 F.Supp. 393, 398-400 (W.D.Mo.1969).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Textile Workers Union of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, J. P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, and Textile Workers Union Ofamerica, Intervenor
Compare Local 57, International Ladies' Garment Workers Union v. N.L.R.B., 374 F.2d 295 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied 387 U.S. 942 , 87 S.Ct. 2078 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1328 (1967). 37 The next provision of the Board's order which we must consider is that requiring the Company to give the Union reasonable access to its bulletin boards for a period of one year.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Textile Workers Union of America v. National Labor Relations Board
Compare Local 57, International Ladies’ Garment Workers Union v. N.L.R.B., 374 F.2d 295 (D.C.Cir.), cert, denied 387 U.S. 942 , 87 S.Ct. 2078 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1328 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roger W. Wheeler, Jr. v. % National Labor Relations/ Board, Northern Virginia Sun, Inc., Intervenor
See also Local 57, International Ladies Garment Workers Union AFL-CIO v. National Labor Relations Board, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 81 , 374 F.2d 295 , cert. denied, 387 U.S. 942 , 87 S.Ct. 2078 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1328 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Domany
v.
Otis Elevator Co.
v.
Otis Elevator Co.
No. 1184.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 5, 1967.
Edward I. Stillman for petitioners. Sumner Canary for Otis Elevator Co., and Russell E. Leasure for Sears, Roebuck & Co., respondents.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.