green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Craycroft v. Ferrall
(2×)
But see Noyd v. McNamara, 267 F.Supp. 701 (D.Colo.), affirmed, 378 F.2d 538 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1022 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Peter Craycroft v. William E. Ferrall, Commandant, Thirteenth Naval District, Robert Strange McNamara as Secretary of Defense, and Robert H. v. Baldwin, as Acting Secretary of the Navy, or His Successor as Acting Secretary, or as Secretary of the Navy, Peter Craycroft v. Clark Clifford, Secretary of Defense, Paul Robert Ignatius, Secretary of the Navy, and H. J. Trum, Commandant, Thirteenth Naval District
(2×)
But see Noyd v. McNamara, 267 F.Supp. 701 (D.Colo.), affirmed, 378 F.2d 538 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1022 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Fulghum Construction Corp.
See Farmers Bank v. Julian, 383 F.2d 314 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1021 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 662 (1967); Wilson v. Kanter (In re Marley-Morse Co.), 275 F. 832 (7th Cir. 1921); In re Stewart, 233 F.Supp. 89 (D.Or.1964).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jensen v. State Bank Of Allison
See Farmers Bank v. Julian, 383 F.2d 314, 326 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1021 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 662 (1967) (test for insolvency under Bankruptcy Act is not inability to meet current obligations, but is the state of having liabilities exceed assets); Dinkelspiel v. Weaver, 116 F.Supp. 455 (W.D.Ark.1953) 8 The record does not indicate whether the State Bank of Allison had taken those steps required of it under I.C.A. § 554.9312 (1967) to insure that its purchase money security interest in Uhlenhopp's cattle had priority over all other security interests in the cattle 9 With th…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jensen v. State Bank of Allison
See Farmers Bank v. Julian, 383 F.2d 314, 326 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1021 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 662 (1967) (test for insolvency under Bankruptcy Act is not inability to meet current obligations, but is the state of having liabilities exceed assets); Dinkelspiel v. Weaver, 116 F.Supp. 455 (W.D.Ark. 1953). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Meaker v. Schlesinger
(2×)
See generally Noyd v. McNamara, 378 F.2d 538 , (10th Cir.) cert. den. 389 U.S. 1022 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967) ; Hammond v. Lenfrest, 398 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1968) ; 10 A.L.R.Fed. 15, §§ 9, 10 and cases cited therein.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Adolph J. Waitkus
See United States v. Mansfield, 381 F.2d 961 (7th Cir. 1967), cert. den. 389 U.S. 1015 , [ 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 661 ] (1967), and cases cited therein.” *24 Since we are convinced from our appraisal of this record that defendant Waitkus was not denied due process at any stage of the investigation and that the trial court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to suppress and return seized property, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jose R. E. Martinez v. Elliot L. Richardson, Individually and as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare
(2×)
See Noyd v. McNamara, 378 F.2d 538 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1022 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967) ; Prairie Band of Pottawatomie Tribe of Indians v. Udall, 355 F.2d 364 , 367 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 831 , 87 S.Ct. 70 , 17 L.Ed.2d 67 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Rahhal v. State
See Mirra v. United States (2d Cir. 1967), 379 Fed. 2d 782, certiorari denied, 389 U. S. 1022 , 88 Sup. Ct. 593, *150 19 L.
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Pasquale A. Delsanter
(4×)
See Mirra v. United States, 379 F.2d 782, 788 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1022 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Even v. Clifford
(2×)
See Noyd v. McNamara, 267 F.Supp. 701 (D.Colo., 1967), affirmed 378 F.2d 538 (10th Cir., 1967), Cert. denied 389 U.S. 1022 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967); Chavez v. Fergusson, Supra.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. Widnall
(2×)
Also included in the scope of review are “[cjourt-martial convictions alleged to involve errors of constitutional proportions” and selective service “induction procedures.” Id. (citation omitted); see also Noyd v. McNamara, 378 F.2d 538, 540 (10th Cir.) (Wide discretion is given to the military to decide what constitutes “for the good of the service.”), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1022 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark, Usafr v. Widnall
(2×)
Also included in the scope of review are "[c]ourt-martial convictions alleged to involve errors of constitutional proportions" and selective service "induction procedures." Id. (citation omitted); see also Noyd v. McNamara, 378 F.2d 538, 540 (10th Cir.) (Wide discretion is given to the military to decide what constitutes "for the good of the service."), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1022 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 (1967). 20 Given these specific limitations within which a civilian court may deal with military affairs, it is noteworthy that Clark appears before us, not as a civilian student, but …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,860, 3 Ucc rep.serv.2d 1700 Thomas E. Wegner v. Cecelia Grunewaldt, Trustee Valley National Bank, a National Banking Corporation and the South Dakota Department of Revenue
Pepper v. Litton, 308 U.S. 295 , 60 S.Ct. 238 , 84 L.Ed. 281 (1939); see, e.g., Farmers Bank v. Julian, 383 F.2d 314, 322-23 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1021 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 662 (1967); In re Kansas city Journal-Post Co., 144 F.2d 791 (8th Cir.1944).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wegner v. Grunewaldt
Pepper v. Litton, 308 U.S. 295 , 60 S.Ct. 238 , 84 L.Ed. 281 (1939); see, e.g., Farmers Bank v. Julian, 383 F.2d 314, 322-23 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1021 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 662 (1967); In re Kansas city Journal-Post Co., 144 F.2d 791 (8th Cir. 1944).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Johns-Manville Corp.
Van Huffel v. Harkelrode, 284 U.S. 225, 227 , 52 S.Ct. 115, 116 , 76 L.Ed. 256 (1931); and see Fierman v. Seward National Bank, 37 F.2d 11, 13 (2d Cir.1930); see also Farmers Bank v. Julian, 383 F.2d 314, 322 (8th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1021 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 662 (1967); Rubenstein v. Nourse, 70 F.2d 482, 484 (8th Cir.1934); In re Penn Central Transportation Co., 383 F.Supp. 1128, 1130 (E.D.Pa.1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James C. Hamilton
See also, United States v. Mansfield, 381 F.2d 961 (CA7 1967), cert. denied 389 U.S. 1015 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 661 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert Dickerson
See also United States v. Guerrina, 112 F.Supp. 126 (E.D.Pa.1953), modified, 126 F.Supp. 609 (E.D.Pa. 1955) 7 E. g., United States v. Mansfield, 381 F.2d 961 (7th Cir. 1967), certiorari denied, 389 U.S. 1015 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 661 ; Muse v. United States, 405 F.2d 40 (8th Cir. 1968); United States v. Mackiewicz, 401 F.2d 219 (2d Cir. 1968); United States v. Squeri, 398 F.2d 785 (2d Cir. 1968); Spinney v. United States, 385 F.2d 908 (1st Cir. 1967), certiorari denied, 390 U.S. 921 , 88 S.Ct. 854 , 19 L.Ed.2d 981 ; United States v. Maius, 378 F.2d 716 (6th Cir. 1967), certiorari denied,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maryann Weissman and Key Martin v. United States
(2×)
See also Noyd v. McNamara, 10 Cir., 378 F.2d 538, 540 , cert, denied 389 U.S. 1022 , 88 S.Ct. 593 , 19 L.Ed.2d 667 ; Luftig v. McNamara, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 4 , 373 F.2d 664, 665-666 , cert, denied 387 U.S. 945 , 87 S.Ct. 2078 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1332 , and Ainsworth v. Barn Ballroom Co., 4 Cir., 157 F.2d 97, 100 . 7 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Noyd
v.
McNamara, Secretary of Defense
v.
McNamara, Secretary of Defense
No. 722.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 18, 1967.
Marvin M. Karpatkin, Ernest Angelí, Melvin L. Wulf, Norman Dorsen and Rhoda H. Karpatkin for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold for respondents., Tolbert H. McCarroll for American Humanist Association, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
Consideration, Douglas, Granted, Should, Took.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Application for stay presented to Mr. Justice White, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.