green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United Parcel Service, Inc. v. United States Postal Service
Accord, e. g., DePinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance Co., 374 F.2d 50 , 51 n.2 (9th Cir.) cert, denied, 389 U.S. 822 , 88 S.Ct. 48 , 19 L.Ed.2d 74 (1967); Macon v. Bailar, 428 F.Supp. 182, 184-85 (E.D.Va. 1977); Armstrong v. O’Connell, 416 F.Supp. 1325,1329 (E.D.Wis.1976); United States v. City of Chicago, 411 F.Supp. 218, 246-47 (N.D.I11.1976) (Marshall, J.), aff’d in part, rev’d in part, 549 F.2d 415 (7th Cir.) cert, denied, 434 U.S. 875 , 98 S.Ct. 225 , 54 L.Ed.2d 155 (1977); 9 Moore’s Federal Practice 1203.11, at 734, 739 (2d ed. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eastern Oklahoma Television Co. v. Ameco, Inc.
See Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. Riffe, 381 F.2d 646 (10th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 822 , 88 S.Ct. 50 , 19 L.Ed.2d 75 ; Gallaher v. Texagon Mills, 67 F.Supp. 845 (S.D.N.Y.1946); Fields v. Victor Building & Loan Co., 73 Okl. 207 , 175 P. 529 (1918).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eastern Oklahoma Television Company, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, and Clear-Vue, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, (Plaintiffs Below) v. Ameco, Inc., a Corporation (Defendant and Third-Party Below) v. Jack Eldridge, Thomas E. Kemp and Troy O. Melton, (Third-Party Below) v. Bill Hoover, (Intervenor Below)
See Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. Riffe, 381 F.2d 646 (10th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 822 , 88 S.Ct. 50 , 19 L.Ed.2d 75 ; Gallaher v. Texagon Mills, 67 F.Supp. 845 (S.D.N.Y.1946); Fields v. Victor Building & Loan Co., 73 Okl. 207 , 175 P. 529 (1918).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Women's Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Cleveland v. Nevada National Bank
Bogert, The Law of Trusts and Trustees § 543(0) at 340 (rev. 2d ed. 1978); see also Wilshire Oil Co. v. Riffe, 381 F.2d 646, 650-52 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 822 , 88 S.Ct. 50 , 19 L.Ed.2d 75 (1967); United States v. Bowen, 290 F.2d 40, 44 (5th Cir.1961) (“It is the action of undertaking to act in self-interest while compelled to act solely for the master’s interest which subjects the servant to the duty to account_ The master as the party whose trust has been betrayed has the widest relief.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Women's Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Nevada National Bank
Bogert, The Law of Trusts and Trustees § 543(O) at 340 (rev. 2d ed. 1978); see also Wilshire Oil Co. v. Riffe, 381 F.2d 646, 650-52 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 822 , 88 S.Ct. 50 , 19 L.Ed.2d 75 (1967); United States v. Bowen, 290 F.2d 40, 44 (5th Cir.1961) (“It is the action of undertaking to act in self-interest while compelled to act solely for the master’s interest which subjects the servant to the duty to account____ The master as the party whose trust has been betrayed has the widest relief.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Apple Valley Bldg. & Development Co., Inc. v. Bonanza Air Lines, Inc.
See also DePinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance Co., 9 Cir., 1967, 374 F.2d 50 , cert. denied, 389 U.S. 822 , 88 S.Ct. 48 , 19 L.Ed. 74 ; Britt v. Damson, 9 Cir., 1964, 334 F.2d 896 , cert. denied 379 U.S. 966 , 85 S.Ct. 661 , 13 L.Ed.2d 560 ; Brawner v. Pearl Assurance Co., 9 Cir., 1958, 267 F.2d 45 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Smith
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
No. 157.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1967.
Edward V. Dylla for petitioner.
Published
Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Certiorari denied.