green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1967 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1967
1996
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Donald McConkey Harris
(2×)
Delay during the period prior to the filing of a formal complaint is controlled by the Statute of Limitations, not by the guarantees of the Sixth Amendment. 3 Hoopengarner v. United States, 270 F.2d 465 (6th Cir. 1959); Nickens v. United States, 116 U.S.App.D.C. 338 , 323 F.2d 808 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 905 , 85 S.Ct. 198 , 13 L.Ed.2d 178 (1964); United States v. Panczko, 367 F.2d 737 (7th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009 , 87 S.Ct. 716 , 17 L.Ed.2d 546 (1967), reh. denied, 385 U.S. 1043 , 87 S.Ct. 771 , 17 L.Ed.2d 688 (1967); but see Schlinsky v. United States, 379 F.2d 735 (1s…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Air Florida, Inc.
See, United States v. Feaster, 376 F.2d 147 (5th Cir. *20 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 237 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
Air Florida, Inc. v. National Mediation Board
As the Court stated, “the Act does not require a hearing when the Board itself designates those who may participate in the election.” Id.; see, U. S. v. Feaster, 376 F.2d 147 , 150 fn. 3 (5th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 237 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony Cartano, A/K/A Etc.
(2×)
Carroll v. United States, 392 F.2d 185 (1st Cir. 1968); Fleming v. United States, 378 F.2d 502 (1st Cir. 1967); see Schlinsky v. United States, 379 F.2d 735 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 236 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fowlkes v. Commonwealth
See, e.g., Schlinsky v. United States, 379 F.2d 735, 737 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 920 (1967); State v. Hollars, 266 N.C. 45, 52 , 145 S.E.2d 309, 314 (1965).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard Bryers Carroll v. United States
(2×)
See also Schlinsky v. United States, 379 F.2d 735, 737 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 920 , 88 S.Ct. 236 , 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schlinsky
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 436.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 23, 1967.
David M. Scheffer for petitioner., Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
Are, Consideration, Douglas, Granted, Should, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Fortas are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.