green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. McINTOSH
See State v. Walker, 199 Kan. 508, 511 , 430 P.2d 246 (1967) (“There need be no accident in order for there to be reckless driving.”), cert, denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 870 (1968). “ ‘[T]o obtain a conviction for reckless driving under 8-1566 it is only necessary to establish that the vehicle was driven in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of others; in other words, under circumstances that show a realization of the imminence of danger and a reckless disregard or complete indifference for the probable consequences of such conduct.’” State v. Brueninger…
discussed
Cited "see"
LONE STAR STEEL COMPANY v. United Mine Workers of America
See A. Duie Pyle, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 383 F.2d 772, 777 (3rd Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 819 , 19 L.Ed. 2d 871 (1968) (noting the undesirability of determining the conscious objective of a union in obtaining the inclusion of a challenged provision in a collective bargaining agreement on a bare stipulation of facts which supplies no indication of purpose or intention beyond the language of the provision and the general bargaining history); cf. Collier v. Hoisting & Portable Engineers Local Union Number 101, 761 F.2d 600 , 602 (10th Cir.1985) (in § 8(b)(4)®, (ii)(B) action s…
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Chauffeurs Local 525
Generally “[agreements which limit the employer, here [Helmkamp], to subcontracting with businesses that recognize the union or have a union contract violate section 8(e).” Building Material, 669 F.2d at 764 ; accord A. Duie Pyle, Inc. v. NLRB, 383 F.2d 772, 777-78 (3d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 819 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968); Local 814, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. NLRB, 546 F.2d 989 (D.C.Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 818 , 98 S.Ct. 56 , 54 L.Ed.2d 73 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen & Helpers Local 525
The test is whether "under all the surrounding circumstances, the Union's objective was preservation of work ... or whether the agreements ... were tactically calculated to satisfy union objectives elsewhere." Id. at 644 , 87 S.Ct. at 1268 . 16 Generally "[a]greements which limit the employer, here [Helmkamp], to subcontracting with businesses that recognize the union or have a union contract violate section 8(e)." Building Material, 669 F.2d at 764; accord A. Duie Pyle, Inc. v. NLRB, 383 F.2d 772, 777-78 (3d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 819 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968); Local 8…
cited
Cited "see"
Feather v. United Mine Workers of America
See A. Duie Pyle, Inc. v. NLRB, 383 F.2d 772, 777-778 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 819 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Rhodes v. Leverette
See, Patton v. State of North Carolina, 381 F.2d 636 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 19 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hill
(2×)
See Patton v. North Carolina, 381 F. 2d 636, 643-44 (4th Cir., 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Swanson v. Fields
See, e.g., State v. Walker, 430 P.2d 246, 250 (Kan.1967) (holding that reckless driving may be shown through violations of the rules of the road, including the failure to stay on the right side of the highway, and does not require proof that the driver exceeded the speed limit), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 (1968); State v. Whitehurst, 772 P.2d 1251, 1253 (Kan.Ct.App.1988) (holding that when vehicle stopped at a stop sign, proceeded forward, backed up past the stop sign, and then accelerated forward rapidly so as to throw gravel, the officer had a reasonable suspicion that the driver was guilty …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pugh v. State
See, e.g., Patton v. State of North Carolina, 381 F. 2d 636, 643 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. den. 390 U. S. 905 , 88 S. Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968); Hoffman v. State, 20 Md. 425, 433 (1863); State v. Barger, supra, 242 Md. at 618-620, 635-636 ; Comment, Double Jeopardy, 75 Yale L.J. 262 (1965).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William Jacob Bruce v. John W. Wingo, Warden, Kentucky State Penitentiary
See also Patton v. State of North Carolina, 381 F.2d 636 (4th Cir. 1967) cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kenneth D. Tipton v. J. E. Baker, Warden
We note the rejection of the notion of waiver of the double jeopardy guarantee in the special circumstances involved in Green v. United States. 355 U.S. 184, 191-192 , 78 S.Ct. 221 , 2 L.Ed.2d 199 ; see also Patton v. North Carolina, 381 F.2d 636, 645-646 , (4th Cir.) cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 , which supports appellant’s position on double jeopardy.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Frank MacKlin Jr. v. United States
Compare Patton v. North Carolina, 381 F.2d 636 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 . 10 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lemieux v. Robbins
See also Patton v. North Carolina, 381 F.2d 636 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U. S. 905 , 88 S.Ct. 818 , 19 L.Ed.2d 871 (1968); United States ex rel.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walker
v.
Kansas
v.
Kansas
No. 875.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1968.
John J. Spriggs, Jr., for petitioner. Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth and John K. Sargent, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Sup. Ct. Kan. Cer-tiorari denied.