Hicks v. Physical Therapists Examining Bd., 390 U.S. 987 (1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Hicks v. Physical Therapists Examining Bd., 390 U.S. 987 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Plummer v. District of Columbia Board of Funeral Directors (dc, 1999-05-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Plummer v. District of Columbia Board of Funeral Directors
D.C. · 1999 · signal: accord · confidence high
It is axiomatic that under the District of Columbia Administrative Procedure Act, D.C.Code § l-1509(b) (1992), “the party asserting a particular fact ... ‘has the burden of affirmatively proving that fact.’ ” Columbia Realty Venture v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Comm’n, 590 A.2d 1043, 1048 (D.C.1991) (citation omitted); accord, e.g., Hicks v. Physical Therapists Examining Board, 221 A.2d 712, 714 (D.C.1966), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 987 , 88 S.Ct. 1181 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1289 (1968).
discussed Cited "see" Janet Ritza, and Eddie Duenez v. International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Pacific Maritime Ass’n, 384 F.2d 935, 936 (9th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 987 , 88 S.Ct. 1181 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1290 (1968); cf. Zuniga v. United Can Co., 812 F.2d 443, 449 (9th Cir.1987) (applying summary judgment analysis to trial determination of exhaustion of internal union remedies).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hicks
v.
Physical Therapists Examining Board for the District of Columbia
No. 1027.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1968.
390 U.S. 987
G. William Hammer for petitioners. Charles T. Duncan, Hubert B. Pair and David P. Sutton for respondent.
Published

C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.