green
Positive treatment
5.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Red Bell Brewing Co. v. GS Capital, L.P. (In Re RBGSC Investment Corp.)
See Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267, 273 (3d *859 Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1968); In re Nutri/System, Inc., 169 B.R. 854, 869 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1994) (“Nutri/System I”), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
718 Arch Street Associates, Ltd. v. Blatstein (In Re Main, Inc.)
See Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267, 273 (3d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 *88 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1968); In re Nutri/System, Inc., 169 B.R. 854, 869 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1994) (“Nutri/System /”), aff'd sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Dow Chemical Co. v. Eby Mine Service
See Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267, 272-72 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Trans Pacific Insurance v. Trans-Pacific Insurance
See Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267, 271-72 (3d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. Disimone
See Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267, 271-72 (3d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Young
(2×)
See Allison v. Ovens, 102 Ariz. 520, 523-24 , 433 P.2d 968, 971-72 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1184 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1294 (1968); overruled on other grounds, Young v. Bach, 107 Ariz. 180, 183 , 484 P.2d 176, 179 (1971); Rail N Ranch Corp. v. State, 7 Ariz. App. 558 , 441 P.2d 786 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
Provencal v. Provencal
See Allison v. Ovens, 4 Ariz. App. 496, 502 , 421 P.2d 929, 935 (1966), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 (1968); T. v. H., 102 N.J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Smithkline Corporation v. Elmer Staats, Comptroller General of the United States, and the United States of America
See Hewlett-Packard v. United States, 385 F.2d 1013, 1016 (9th Cir. 1967) (noting that, if production costs are “out of line with the contract price, the contract may have been an inappropriate means of meeting this particular procurement need.. .. [and this approach] could lead to the use of other methods of meeting future procurement needs”), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1184 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1292 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eli Lilly & Co. v. Elmer B. Staats, Comptroller General of the United States, and United States
(2×)
Accord, Hewlett-Packard Company v. United States, 385 F.2d 1013, 1016 (9th Cir. 1967), certiorari denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1184 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1292 ; Merck & Co., Inc. v. Staats, Civil Action No. 74-1447 (D.D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Horwat v. PAULSEN-WEBBER CORDAGE CORPORATION
Camera v. Lancaster Chemical Corporation, 387 F.2d 946 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1027 , 88 S.Ct. 1418 , 20 L.Ed.2d 285 ; see Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
American Trading & Production Corp. v. Fischbach & Moore, Inc.
See Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267, 272-273 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1291 .
cited
Cited "see"
Haskins v. Point Towing Co.
See Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267 (3rd Cir. 1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haskins v. Point Towing Co.
See Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267 (3rd Cir. 1967), cert. den. 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1968). 14 For the reasons stated above, the District Court's order of December 26, 1968, will be affirmed. 15 McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge (dissenting). 16 In approaching these seamen actions, the words of Mr. Justice Story (sitting as Circuit Justice) should always be very much in mind: 17 'Every court should watch with jealousy an encroachment upon the rights of seamen, because they are unprotected and need counsel; * * * because they are credulous and complying; and are easily overreach…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
MB Ltd. Partnership v. Nutri/System, Inc. (In Re Nutri/System, Inc.)
See also Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267 , 270 n. 2 (3d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1968) (“[The movants] have ‘the burden of establishing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the corporation was an artifice and a sham designed to execute illegitimate purposes in abuse of the corporate fiction and the immunity it carries....”’ quoting Coryell v. Phipps, 128 F.2d 702, 704 (5th Cir.1942), aff'd on other grounds, 317 U.S. 406 , 63 S.Ct. 291 , 87 L.Ed. 363 (1943)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Parker v. Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd.
See, e.g., Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267 (3d Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wicks v. Milzoco Builders, Inc.
See also Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267, 275 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1967). 6 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowsher v. Merck & Co.
(4×)
See also Hewlett-Packard Co. v. United States, 385 F. 2d 1013 (CA9 1967) (permitting access to records of direct production costs, including direct material, direct labor, and overhead costs), cert. denied, 390 U. S. 988 (1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pridgeon v. Superior Court
See also Allison v. Ovens, 4 Ariz.App. 496 , 421 P.2d 929 (1966), modified on other grounds, 102 Ariz. 520 , 433 P.2d 968 (1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1184 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1294 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Webster Dictionary Company, Inc.
See, e. g., Zubik v. Zubik, 384 F.2d 267 (3d Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1183 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1968); My Bread Baking Co. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc., 353 Mass. 614 , 233 N.E.2d 748 (1968).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dahl, Inc. v. Roy Cooper Co., Inc.
United States v. American Society of Composers, Authors, and Publishers, 341 F.2d 1003 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 877 , 86 S.Ct. 160 , 15 L.Ed.2d 119 (1965); see also, United States Gypsum Co. v. National Gypsum Co., 387 F.2d 799 (7th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 988 , 88 S.Ct. 1184 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1292 (1968). 3.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zubik
v.
Zubik, Executors
v.
Zubik, Executors
No. 1075.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1968.
Norman J. Cowie and Douglas A. Jacobsen for petitioners. Benjamin F. Stahl, Jr., for respondents.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.