Brooks v. Briley, 391 U.S. 361 (1968). · Go Syfert
Search
Brooks v. Briley, 391 U.S. 361 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
40 citation events across 19 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Koen v. Long (moed, 1969-08-04)
Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968 1997 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Koen v. Long
E.D. Mo. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally, Brooks v. Briley, 274 F.Supp. 538 , aff'd 391 U.S. 361 , 88 S.Ct. 1671 , 20 L.Ed.2d 647 .
cited Cited "see" Vick v. Schiro
E.D. La. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See per curiam affirmance, 391 U.S. 361 , 88 S.Ct. 1671 , 20 L.Ed.2d 647 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." J. L. Leflore v. James Robinson
5th Cir. · 1970 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Brooks v. Briley, M.D.Tenn. 1967, 274 F.Supp. 538, 553 (three-judge court) (Section 2283 “cannot be avoided by seeking a declaratory judgment”) (alternative holding), aff’d per curiam on other grounds, 1968, 391 U.S. 361 , 88 S.Ct. 1671 , 20 L.Ed.2d 647 . .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Mike Honey and Martha Allen v. Jon Goodman, Shelby M. Howard, and J. W. Shines (2×)
6th Cir. · 1970 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare, e. g., Brooks v. Briley, 274 F.Supp. 538 (M.D.Tenn.1967) (three-judge court), aff'd per curiam, 391 U.S. 361 , 88 S.Ct. 1671 , 20 L.Ed.2d 647 (1968) (holding that section 2283 bars not only federal injunctions against pending state court proceedings, but also declaratory judgments); Armstrong v. Ellington, 312 F.Supp. 1119 (W.D.Tenn. 1970) (three-judge court) (holding that section 1983 is not an "express exception" to section 2283); with, Baker v. Bindner, 274 F.Supp. 658 (W.D.Ky. 1967) (three-judge court) (holding that section 1983 is an "express exception" to section 2283).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BROOKS Et Al.
v.
BRILEY, MAYOR OF NASHVILLE, Et Al.
1285, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 20, 1968.
391 U.S. 361
William M. Kunstler, Arthur Kinoy, Howard Moore, Jr., and Morton Stavis for appellants., George F. McCanless, Attorney General of Tennessee, Thomas E. Fox, Assistant Attorney General, Edwin F. Hunt, and Robert E. Kendrick for appellees.
Douglas.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to affirm is also granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cameron v. Johnson, 390 U. S. 611.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.