green
Positive treatment
2.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Foster & Forster v. State
Cir. 1971), the show-up identification occurred within one and one-half hours. 8 Other courts have not been so rigid in applying the proximity of time to the offense; in Neil v. Biggers, supra, there was an interval of seven months; in Kirby v. Illinois, supra, the confrontation took place two days after the robbery; in Roper v. Beto, 454 F. 2d 499, 502-03 (5th Cir. 1971) , the identification was made at a police station three days after a rape; in Johnson v. United States, 362 F. 2d 43, 47 (8th Cir. 1966), the confrontation took place at a police station five days after a theft; in United Sta…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rogelio Soto
See Spurrier v. United States, 389 F.2d 367 (5th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 391 U.S. 922 , 88 S.Ct. 1814 , 20 L.Ed.2d 658 (1968); Tillman v. United States, 268 F.2d 422 (5th Cir.1959); see also United States v. Atkinson, 513 F.2d 38 (4th Cir.1975); McGill v. United States, 270 F.2d 329 (D.C.Cir. 1958), cert. denied, 362 U.S. 905 , 80 S.Ct. 615 , 4 L.Ed.2d 555 (I960). 7 Thus, the dis *1562 trict court erred when it found that the handwritten drafts of the agents’ reports became Jencks Act materials when Agent Foley used them to refresh his recollection before the preliminary hearing.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bickham
v.
McSweeny
v.
McSweeny
No. 1239.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 20, 1968.
391 U.S. 922
Published
Cir. Ct., Will County, Ill. Certiorari denied.