O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden, 393 U.S. 822 (1968). · Go Syfert
Search
O’Callahan v. Parker, Warden, 393 U.S. 822 (1968). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
19 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Rock v. State (mdctspecapp, 1969-04-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Rock v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Orozco v. State of Texas, 393 U. S. 822 , decided 25 March 1969. *627 THE CRIME OE PRACTICING MEDICINE WITHO UT A LICENSE Although our holding makes it unnecessary that we consider the question presented whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain the conviction, we deem it advisable to construe such statutes as relate to the offense here charged.
cited Cited "see" Mulligan v. State
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1969 · signal: see · confidence high
See Orozco v. State of Texas, 393 U. S. 822 , decided 25 March 1969, note 4.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James F. O'Callahan
v.
J. J. Parker, Warden
202, Misc.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 25, 1968.
393 U.S. 822
Victor Rabino-witz and Leonard B. Boudin for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold for respondent.
Published

C. A. 3d Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the first question presented by the petition which reads as follows: “Does a court-martial, held under the Articles of War, Tit. 10, U. S. C. § 801 et seq., have jurisdiction to try a member of the Armed Forces who is charged with commission of a crime cognizable in a civilian court and having no military significance, alleged to have been committed off-post and while on leave, thus depriving him of his constitutional rights to indictment by a grand jury and trial by a petit jury in a civilian court?” Case transferred to appellate docket.