green
Positive treatment
1.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1970 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1970
1998
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tuthill
Nor did the modification `materially increase[]' the risk the bondsman accepted."); State v. Vaughn, 11 P.3d 211, 214-15 (Okla.2000) (the prosecution's decision to add new charges, arising from the original transaction, which increased defendant's maximum possible sentence "did not materially increase the Bondsman's bargained-for risk"); see also United States v. Egan, 394 F. 2d 262, 265-66 (2d Cir.) (an order that originally required defendant to report daily to the marshal, later modified to require reporting at ten day intervals, did not enlarge the conditions of bail or enhance the chances…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Wray
Stuyvesant Insurance Co. v. United States, 410 F.2d 524, 526 (8th Cir. 1969); United States v. Caro, 56 F.R.D. 16, 19 (S.D.Fla.1972); see also, United States v. Egan, 394 F. 2d 262, 267 (2nd Cir. 1968), cert. denied sub nom., Stuyvesant Insurance Co. v. United States, 393 U.S. 838 , 89 S.Ct. 116 , 21 L.Ed.2d 109 (1968).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McFarland
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 229.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 14, 1968.
Edward J. Walsh for petitioner., Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.